FIG. 2.
Optimization results of the DM dynamic optimization. (a) The amplitudes of different Zernike modes from Z4 to Z18 at different optimized defocus positions. (b) The maximum Strehl ratios (see supplementary material Sec. 4) obtained from the central 200 × 200 μm2 region of the best Strehl maps at different optimized defocus positions, and mean Strehl ratios obtained from the central 200 × 200 μm2 region of the 0 μm displacement Strehl maps at different optimized defocus positions. Data obtained immediately after and 48 h after optimization. (c) Strehl maps (600 × 600 μm2) at different distances from the optimized defocus positions, which were used to generate the best Strehl maps and field curvature projections shown in the righthand two columns, respectively (see the supplementary material Sec. 8).

Optimization results of the DM dynamic optimization. (a) The amplitudes of different Zernike modes from Z4 to Z18 at different optimized defocus positions. (b) The maximum Strehl ratios (see supplementary material Sec. 4) obtained from the central 200 × 200 μm2 region of the best Strehl maps at different optimized defocus positions, and mean Strehl ratios obtained from the central 200 × 200 μm2 region of the 0 μm displacement Strehl maps at different optimized defocus positions. Data obtained immediately after and 48 h after optimization. (c) Strehl maps (600 × 600 μm2) at different distances from the optimized defocus positions, which were used to generate the best Strehl maps and field curvature projections shown in the righthand two columns, respectively (see the supplementary material Sec. 8).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal