Graphene oxide (GO) is a two-dimensional carbon material with a graphene-like structure and many oxygen-containing functional groups, and in recent years from research into the unique optical properties of GO, GO-based composite materials formed by combining with other materials have shown improved overall performance. Reported here is an investigation of how doping with Ni, Fe, and Ag nanoparticles affects the linear and nonlinear optical properties of GO films. The morphology and structure of films of GO, GO with Ni nanoparticles, GO with Fe nanoparticles, and GO with Ag nanoparticles were studied by laser scanning confocal microscopy, SEM, energy dispersive spectroscopy, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy. UV–visible absorption spectra were used to study the optical absorption properties, and the optical band gaps of GO and the composites were calculated from those spectra via Tauc plots. The results show that the band gaps of GO films can be effectively regulated by metal nanoparticles, and so the properties of GO composites can be manipulated. The nonlinear optical properties of GO and GO–metal-nanoparticle composite films were studied by femtosecond laser Z-scanning. The results show that the femtosecond laser power can be tuned to the optical limiting behavior of GO. The strong synergistic coupling effect between metal nanoparticles and GO enhances the nonlinear absorption and nonlinear refraction of composite thin films. The nonlinear absorption coefficient of the composite thin films is improved significantly, and the optical limiting properties are excellent. GO–metal-nanoparticle composite materials have potential applications and advantages in improving optical absorption, band-gap control, and optical limiting. They can promote the expansion of GO composite materials in various practical applications and are candidates for good optical materials, opening the way to GO photonics.

  • Composite films of graphene oxide doped with Ni, Fe, and Ag nanoparticles were prepared successfully via vacuum filtration.

  • Raman spectroscopy revealed electronic interactions between the graphene oxide and metal nanoparticles.

  • The optical absorption characteristics and bandgap adjustments of graphene oxide with Ni, Fe, and Ag nanoparticles were investigated.

  • The nonlinear optical properties of composite films of graphene oxide and metal nanoparticles were analyzed using femtosecond laser Z-scanning and were significantly better than those of undoped graphene oxide.

As the most prevalent derivative of graphene, graphene oxide (GO) comprises a layered sp2–sp3 carbon network modified by oxygen-containing functional groups. Because of its exceptional mechanical properties, high carrier mobility, and superior thermal conductivity, GO has extensive applications in gas sensors, supercapacitors, field-effect transistors, nonvolatile memory devices, flexible electronic devices, and various other domains.1–6 Also, GO has outstanding linear optical (LO) properties due to its oxygen-containing functional groups. Numerous studies7–10 have indicated that GO has a broad optical band gap, with its distinctive sp2–sp3 carbon hybrid serving as the foundation for the adjustable broadband gap of GO, making it a promising candidate for manufacturing optoelectronic devices.

Besides intriguing LO properties, the 2D structure of GO films combined with the aforementioned tunable optical band gap results in exceptional nonlinear optical (NLO) properties, characterized by strong nonlinear absorption (NLA) and significant Kerr nonlinearity.11 The NLO absorption of GO fluctuates with light intensity and can manifest in various forms, ranging from saturation absorption (SA) to reverse saturation absorption (RSA) depending on the excitation wavelength and band gap of the specific GO film. SA has extensive applications in pulse compression, Q switching, and mode-locking, whereas RSA is used in optical limiting and the prevention of high-power laser damage.12–14 Jiang et al.15 investigated the optical limiting behavior of GO thin films for femtosecond laser pulses at 800 and 400 nm, a property that could be adjusted by regulating the degree of reduction. Enhancing the NLO response of GO is very important for broadening its use in optical shutters, light limiting, information processing, and various photonic applications.

Recently, the NLO properties of GO and its composites have attracted significant research attention within the GO domain, leading to a plethora of pertinent literature. Ma et al.16 prepared reduced GO films via photochemical and photothermal reduction to acquire reduced GO, subsequently evaluating their NLO response. The results showed that reduced graphene oxide (rGO) exhibits significant optical nonlinearity, particularly in terms of two-photon absorption (TPA); an exceptionally high TPA coefficient of 105 cm/GW was achieved via two photo-reduction mechanisms, revealing a substantial enhancement in the TPA of graphene-based materials. Hao et al.17 investigated the NLO properties of CuS/rGO composites using the hydrothermal method; the results showed that as the graphene content in CuS/rGO nanocomposites increases, a transition from RSA to SA occurs, suggesting that the enhancement in nonlinearity is due to the synergistic effect among multiple materials. Fraser et al.18 doped Au nanoparticles (NPs) into GO films acquired via vacuum filtration to achieve tunable third-order optical nonlinearity at varying doping concentrations. Kimiagar and Abrinaei19 synthesized MgO–GO nanocomposites using the hydrothermal method and determined their NLA coefficient β and nonlinear refraction (NLR) index n2 at a laser intensity of 1.1 × 108 W/cm2 to be 10−7 cm/W and 10−12 cm2/W, respectively.

At present, the NLO properties of GO composites predominantly encompass composites of GO and organic molecules, metal sulfides, metal nanoparticles (MNPs), or metal oxides. Metal materials have been extensively researched and utilized because of their high specific strength, high specific modulus, high corrosion resistance, exceptional electric heating properties, and superior machining characteristics. The combination of MNPs with GO induces a synergistic effect that enhances energy transfer. GO–MNP composites exhibit superior NLO properties compared to pristine GO, thereby offering increased potential for applications in photoelectric materials, optical limiting, and NLO theory research. However, the investigation of the NLO properties of composites of GO and precious-metal or metal-oxide NPs is currently incomplete, with no examination of the NLO properties of GO composites containing other MNPs such as Fe and Ni.

In the study reported herein, Ni, Fe, and Ag NPs were used for doping GO, and the LO and NLO properties of composites of GO with Ni, Fe, or Ag NPs were investigated systematically. The surface morphology and structure of these composites were analyzed using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), SEM, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), XRD, and Raman spectroscopy. The optical absorption properties were analyzed using UV–visible absorption spectra, and the optical band gaps of both GO and its composites were determined from Tauc plots constructed from those spectra. Also, the NLO properties of the thin films were investigated using femtosecond laser Z-scanning.

The modified Hummer’s method was used to prepare an aqueous solution of GO with a concentration of 1 mg/ml via oxidation, sonication, and centrifugation (see the supplementary material for details). With a particle size of ∼500 nm and sourced from Beijing Ryubon New Material Technology Co., Ltd., Ni, Fe, or Ag powder was prepared as an aqueous solution with a concentration of 5 mg/ml and then subjected to sonication for 1 h. Next, 1 ml of the GO aqueous solution was combined with 0.1 ml of the MNP aqueous solution, followed by ultrasonic treatment for 30 min to ensure thorough and uniform mixing of the components. After that, the films were fabricated via vacuum filtration. As shown in Fig. 1, an organic nylon filter membrane (thickness: 60 μm; diameter: 25 mm) was initially placed in the liquid intake area of a suction filter bottle, and a glass rod was used to introduce the diluted solution into the suction filter bottle. The suction pump was then activated, and ca. 1–2 h were allowed for the GO film to attach to the filter membrane. The materials were maintained at a consistent temperature of 25 °C for 24 h, then the filter membrane was immersed in deionized water, causing the GO film and filter membrane to separate automatically and become suspended on the water surface. The prepared film was then transferred onto conductive glass. Finally, after drying for 24 h at 25 °C, the material was ready for experimental use. Films of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs were prepared using vacuum filtration and exhibited excellent flatness and high uniformity.

FIG. 1.

Preparation of graphene oxide (GO) films and GO–metal nanoparticle (MNP) composite films by vacuum filtration.

FIG. 1.

Preparation of graphene oxide (GO) films and GO–metal nanoparticle (MNP) composite films by vacuum filtration.

Close modal

The surface morphologies of the samples were examined using a laser scanning confocal microscope (OLS4100; Olympus) and a field emission scanning electron microscope (S-4800; Hitachi), and their components were analyzed using an energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometer (JSM6360A; JEOL). XRD measurements were conducted using a Rigaku MiniFlex 600 with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å). A Horiba LabRAM Odyssey spectrometer was used for Raman spectrum characterization, with a 532-nm excitation source. A 50× objective lens (NA = 0.75; Olympus) was used, and a CCD was used to capture the scattered signal from the 600-gr/mm grating. Before the experiment, the spectrometer was calibrated meticulously using the Si Raman peak at 520.7 cm−1. During the measurement process, the laser power was ∼10 mW, the spectral integration time was set to 4 s, the integration was repeated twice, and the spectral range was 800–3500 cm−1. UV-visible absorption spectra were acquired in the range of 200–800 nm using a Lambda 750S spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Inc.).

The NLO properties of the thin films of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs were characterized using Z-scan technology, and Fig. 2 shows the specific experimental equipment. This Z-scan system uses an ultrafast fiber laser (Keplin Photoelectric Technology Co., Ltd.) emitting at a central wavelength of 515 nm with a pulse duration of 285 fs and a repetition rate of 200 kHz. After passing through the spectroscope, the laser beam is divided into two parts: one part is captured by power meter D2 as the experimental reference light (in the vertical direction); the other serves as the experimental excitation light (in the original direction). The excited beam is directed through a convex lens (f = 150 mm), while the sample is displaced along the z axis using an electric displacement platform and the beam is focused on it with a beam waist radius of 5.9 μm. Both the open and closed aperture signals are captured by power meter D1. The transmittance of the sample varies with the input energy, which is modulated by moving in and out of the beam focus along the z axis.

FIG. 2.

Schematic of experimental apparatus for Z-scan measurement (D1 and D2: optical power meters).

FIG. 2.

Schematic of experimental apparatus for Z-scan measurement (D1 and D2: optical power meters).

Close modal

Figures 3(a)3(d) show LSCM images of the GO, GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP thin films, respectively. LSCM can be used to characterize the surface morphology, dispersion uniformity, and roughness of GO films. Figure 3 shows that the surface of the prepared GO film appears relatively flat. However, the surface morphology of the GO film undergoes significant changes when loaded with MNPs. Also, the uniform color of the image suggests good uniformity in the prepared film.

FIG. 3.

Confocal laser microscope images of films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 3.

Confocal laser microscope images of films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal

The materials were characterized using SEM to assess the impact of MNP loading on the GO morphology. Figures 4(a)4(d) show SEM images of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs, respectively. Wrinkles and folds are evident on the surface of GO. These features can be attributed to the formation of sp3 carbon and oxygen-containing functional groups on the base surface, along with the presence of various structural defects in GO.20,21 Figures 4(b)4(d) show that the GO was decorated with MNPs without any noticeable aggregation. The insets in Fig. 4 indicate that the particle size is ∼500 nm.

FIG. 4.

SEM images of films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 4.

SEM images of films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal

The combination of SEM and EDS enables the simultaneous analysis of both the morphology and microscopic elements of the product. Figures 5(a)5(d) show the EDS results for the major elements of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs, respectively. The primary characteristic of the GO-based structure is the presence of observable C and O atoms.22 In addition, the characteristic peaks of Ni atoms at ∼0.85 keV, Fe atoms at ∼0.7 keV, and Ag atoms at ∼3 keV can also be seen. The concentrations of the main elements are given in Table I; as can be seen, the concentration of oxygen in GO is 43.01 wt. %, while the addition of MNPs leads to a notable decrease in the concentration of oxygen in GO composite films (GO + Ni NPs: 28.57 wt. %; GO + Fe NPs: 30.69 wt. %; GO + Ag NPs: 30.51 wt. %). Because of the combination of MNPs with oxygen-containing functional groups in GO, the content of oxygen elements is reduced, suggesting that MNPs exhibit a reduction effect on GO.23 

FIG. 5.

Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) images of films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 5.

Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) images of films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal
TABLE I.

Elemental compositions of GO and GO–MNP composites.

SampleC (normal wt. %)O (normal wt. %)Metal (normal wt. %)
GO 56.99 43.01 
GO + Ni NPs 54.69 28.57 16.74 
GO + Fe NPs 55.7 30.69 13.61 
GO + Ag NPs 55.12 30.51 14.37 
SampleC (normal wt. %)O (normal wt. %)Metal (normal wt. %)
GO 56.99 43.01 
GO + Ni NPs 54.69 28.57 16.74 
GO + Fe NPs 55.7 30.69 13.61 
GO + Ag NPs 55.12 30.51 14.37 

XRD is frequently used to analyze the phase and crystal structure of materials, and Fig. 6 shows the XRD patterns of the GO, GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP films. As can be seen, the original GO sample exhibits a diffraction peak at 2θ = 11.3°, which corresponds to the (001) plane of GO. In the XRD pattern of the GO–MNP composite films, the diffraction peak of the MNPs is also observed in addition to the diffraction peak of GO. GO + Ni NPs exhibit diffraction peaks at 2θ = 44.5°, 52.1°, and 76.7°, corresponding to the (111), (200), and (220) planes of Ni NPs (JCPDS No. 04-0850), respectively.24 GO + Fe NPs exhibit diffraction peaks at 2θ = 44.7° and 65.0°, corresponding to the (110) and (200) planes of Fe NPs (JCPDS No. 99-0064), respectively.25 GO + Ag NPs exhibit diffraction peaks at 2θ = 38.5°, 44.7°, 64.8°, and 77.7°, corresponding to the (111), (200) (220), and (311) planes of Ag NPs (JCPDS No. 01-887-0597), respectively.26 Therefore, the successful synthesis of GO–MNP composite films is further demonstrated by the XRD patterns.

FIG. 6.

XRD patterns of films of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 6.

XRD patterns of films of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal

Raman spectroscopy was used to characterize the GO, GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP thin films. Graphene and graphene-based materials exhibit three main characteristic peaks, i.e., the D band at ∼1350 cm−1, the G band at ∼1585 cm−1, and the 2D band at ∼2700 cm−1. The D band represents a defect-induced Raman peak associated with the vibration of sp3 hybrid carbon atoms, revealing disorder within the graphene system and serving to characterize structural defects or edges in graphene samples. The G band is the Raman characteristic peak of all sp2 carbon materials, depicting the vibration mode of first-order Raman scattering resulting from the stretching vibration between C–C bonds in the plane. The 2D band represents a second-order Raman mode of sp2 carbon, originating from double-resonance Raman scattering; its strength and shape vary with the number of graphene layers. Moreover, the Raman peak at ∼2950 cm−1 is associated with the combination of D+G and is also induced by disorder.27–30 

Figure 7 shows the typical Raman spectra of the GO, GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP composite films, alongside the corresponding data given in Table II. As can be seen, a frequency shift occurs in the D band of the GO film doped with MNPs, and the half-peak width (FWHM) increases, while the G band does not change. The D band of GO + Ni NPs is shifted by 5 cm−1 to a higher frequency, with a corresponding 13% increase in FWHM. Similarly, the D band of GO + Fe NPs exhibits a 3-cm−1 shift to a higher frequency, accompanied by a 9% increase in FWHM. Furthermore, the D band of GO + Ag NPs experiences an 8-cm−1 shift to a higher frequency, coupled with a 22% increase in FWHM. The variation in the amplitude of the D-band frequency shift is associated with the ionization energy of the MNPs.31  Figure 8 shows the relationship between the frequency shift of the D band and the ionization energy of the metal. Note that the ionization energy follows the order of Ag < Ni < Fe, with respective values of 7.5, 7.6, and 7.9 eV. The amplitude of the D-band shift decreases as the metal ionization energy increases, and a similar trend is observed for the half-peak width of the D band. A higher ionization energy in the metal results in tighter electron binding, thereby restricting the charge transfer between the MNPs and GO. Because the charge transfer itself is related to the ionization energy and electron affinity of the metal particles, the present Raman spectroscopy shows that there is a significant electronic interaction between the MNPs and the GO.32,33

FIG. 7.

Raman spectra of films of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 7.

Raman spectra of films of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal
TABLE II.

Raman data for GO and GO–MNP composites.

SampleD-band position (cm−1)FWHM of D band (cm−1)G-band position (cm−1)FWHM of G band (cm−1)
GO 1350 139 1590 100 
GO + Ni NPs 1355 157 1590 100 
GO + Fe NPs 1353 152 1590 100 
GO + Ag NPs 1358 170 1590 100 
SampleD-band position (cm−1)FWHM of D band (cm−1)G-band position (cm−1)FWHM of G band (cm−1)
GO 1350 139 1590 100 
GO + Ni NPs 1355 157 1590 100 
GO + Fe NPs 1353 152 1590 100 
GO + Ag NPs 1358 170 1590 100 
FIG. 8.

Shift in position of D band with ionization energy of metal.

FIG. 8.

Shift in position of D band with ionization energy of metal.

Close modal

Figure 9 shows the normalized 2D peak strength of the GO, GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP films. As can be seen, the 2D peak intensity of GO films doped with MNPs decreases, while the half-peak width increases. Inserting MNPs diminishes the intermolecular forces among GO sheets, and given that the 2D peak typically corresponds to the vibrational mode between the graphene layers, the diminished intermolecular force induces a shift in the vibration mode of GO. This results in a reduction of the 2D peak intensity and an increase in the half-peak width observed in Raman spectroscopy.34 

FIG. 9.

2D peak strength of films of GO, GO + Ag NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ni NPs after normalization.

FIG. 9.

2D peak strength of films of GO, GO + Ag NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ni NPs after normalization.

Close modal

1. Linear optical properties

Figure 10 shows the UV–visible absorption spectra of the GO, GO–Ag-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ni-NP films. The data represent the average of 10 distinct measurements, all conducted under identical conditions. As can be seen, the UV–visible spectrum of GO exhibits a characteristic absorption band of double absorption peaks, with a strong absorption peak at 230 nm, corresponding to the ππ* transition of the C=C bond; there is a weak absorption peak at 300 nm that corresponds to the nπ* transition of the C=O bond.19,35 The absorption spectra of the three GO–MNP composite films differ from that of GO. The GO–Ag-NP thin film exhibits a distinct and well-defined absorption edge in the UV region, with the characteristic absorption peak shifting to 252 nm, representing a redshift of 22 nm compared to GO. This redshift phenomenon indicates that adding Ag NPs causes the reduction of GO, thereby restoring the π-electron conjugation within the GO sheet.19,36,37 At the same time, the absorption of the GO–Ag-NP film is notably enhanced in the visible region (400–780 nm), with the absorption band around 420 nm corresponding to the distinctive surface plasmonic resonance (SPR) of Ag NPs. The absorption of GO + Fe NPs in the visible region (400–780 nm) is between that of GO + Ag NPs and GO + Ni NPs. Fe NPs typically exhibit absorption peaks in the range of 330–350 nm, resulting in GO + Fe NPs exhibiting significantly broad peaks spanning 300–500 nm due to SPR induced by Fe NPs.38 The UV–visible absorption spectrum of GO + Ni NPs closely resembles that of GO, with the characteristic absorption peak at 230 nm being redshifted to 234 nm. This shift suggests that adding Ni NPs restores π-electron conjugation in the GO sheet. In addition, the weak absorption peaks at 362 nm and ∼490 nm are attributed to the SPR absorption of Ni NPs between 300 and 400 nm. Jaleh et al. calculated that the SPR absorption of Ni NPs is at ∼350 and 490 nm.39 The slight redshift of the absorption band is related to the size of the NPs.40 The optical absorption of GO + Ag NPs is most prominent in the UV–visible region, making them an excellent option for photosensitive materials and for fabricating devices with high absorptivity. These properties are highly advantageous in a range of optical applications, including solar absorbers and photocatalysis. Also, GO + Fe NPs and GO + Ni NPs exhibit significant potential for advancement in the development of integrated optoelectronic devices such as photodetectors and optical sensors, attributed to their broad absorption range within the visible light spectrum.

FIG. 10.

UV–visible absorption spectra of films of GO, GO + Ag NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ni NPs.

FIG. 10.

UV–visible absorption spectra of films of GO, GO + Ag NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ni NPs.

Close modal
We also obtained the optical band gap Eg of the GO, GO–Ag-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ni-NP films by using the Tauc plot as given by the following Tauc relationship:
(1)
where α is the light absorption coefficient, is the incident photon energy, A is a constant, and n depends on the type of semiconductor (n = 1/2 for direct band gap and n = 2 for indirect band gap). Because the band gap of GO is defined as a function of the degree of oxidation or the content of oxygen additions, it is not constant and its optical band gap is between 1 eV and up to 4.5 eV in semiconductors.19,41 Figure 11 shows the relationship between (αhυ)2 and the photon energy of the four films, from which the optical band gap is extracted. The GO film exhibits an optical band gap of 2.60 eV, aligning closely with that of GO documented in existing literature.42,43 The optical band gap of the composite films—i.e., GO + Ag NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ni NPs—is observed to decrease to 2.45, 1.40, and 2.15 eV, respectively. The decrease in the band gap can be attributed to the localized states created within the confined region due to defects formed by the GO sheet. The random distribution of the defects on the GO sheet results in the random distribution of sp2 carbon, which is responsible for the alteration of the optical band gap.44 The varying degree of the band gap of GO composite films with different metals can be attributed to the electronic interaction, interface bond, and synergistic effect between the metal and GO.45–47 The degree of band-gap regulation is related to the reducibility of metals: metals with higher reducibility typically exhibit a stronger electron donor ability, thereby amplifying the charge transfer effect with GO. The band gap of the most reductive GO–Fe-NP composite film is observed to be adjusted by 1.20 eV, while the band gap of the second-most reductive GO–Ni-NP composite film is adjusted by 0.45 eV, and the band gap of the least reductive GO–Ag-NP composite film is adjusted by 0.15 eV. This demonstrates that the MNPs can effectively regulate the band gap of the GO film, enabling the manipulation of characteristics in GO composites, including conductivity, refractive index, and absorption. This aspect offers significant application potential and commercial value for the wide range of GO band-gap tuning.
FIG. 11.

Relationship between (αhυ)2 and photon energy for films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ag NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ni NPs.

FIG. 11.

Relationship between (αhυ)2 and photon energy for films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ag NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ni NPs.

Close modal

2. Nonlinear optical properties

Figure 12(a) shows the intensity-dependent open-aperture (OA) Z-scan data for GO. The symbols are the experimental points, and the solid lines are the theoretically fitted curves by considering TPA processes using
(2)
where β is the NLA coefficient, I0 is the light intensity of incident light at the focus of the focusing lens, Leff is the effective length of the sample, and z0 is the Rayleigh range. The laser intensity I0 is 1.65 × 1013, 3.7 × 1014, 6.9 × 1014, or 2.16 × 1015 W/m2. As can be seen, the normalized transmission decreases as the sample approaches the beam focus, resulting in the formation of a valley with a pronounced focus. This indicates that the laser-irradiated GO film presents RSA due to excited state absorption and TPA, typical of the extended π-conjugation properties in the chemistry of carbon-based materials.48 The valley depth of the Z-scan curve reflects the optical limiting property of the material: the deeper the valley, the better the optical limiting property.49 With increasing laser intensity, enhanced RSA behavior is observed, indicating that the optical limiting properties of GO films are strongly dependent on the femtosecond laser intensity. Figure 12(b) shows the intensity-dependent closed-aperture (CA) Z-scan data for GO, where the symbols are the experimental points and the solid lines represent the theoretical simulation using the relation proposed by Guo et al.50 The theoretical normalized transmittance T from the contribution of pure NLR can be obtained from
(3)
with μ = 2(3 + x2)/(9 + x2), φ = −4x ln(1 − S)/(9 + x2), ΔΦ = kγI0Leff, and x = z/z0. The experimental CA Z-scan trace TCA(x) usually consists of contributions from multiphoton absorption TOA(x) and NLR. Therefore, the contribution from pure NLR to the experimental CA Z-scan data is obtained using the following analytical relationship:
(4)
By defining the difference between the normalized peak and valley transmittances in T(x) as ΔTpv, the relationship between ΔTpv and ΔΦ for any given S can be expressed as
(5)
where a1 = −0.4070, a2 = −0.1461, a3 = −0.4841, a4 = 0.3862, a5 = 0.0423, and a6 = −0.3696. In the CA Z-scan results [Fig. 12(b)], the transmittance of the GO film presents a pre-focal peak and post-focal trough, indicating that the GO film has a self-defocusing phenomenon and its nonlinear refractive index is negative. Meanwhile, with increasing laser intensity, the NLR effect of GO films is observed to be enhanced. The NLO properties of GO can be tuned by the intensity of the femtosecond laser.
FIG. 12.

Intensity-dependent (a) open-aperture and (b) closed-aperture Z-scan curves (points: experimental data; solid lines: theoretical fits).

FIG. 12.

Intensity-dependent (a) open-aperture and (b) closed-aperture Z-scan curves (points: experimental data; solid lines: theoretical fits).

Close modal
To explore the NLO properties of the GO–MNP composite films, we also used Z-scan technology to characterize the NLO properties of the GO, GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP films (as shown in Figs. 13 and 14). During the experiment, the incident laser intensity on the sample was kept consistently at I0 = 7 × 1014 W/m2 by regulating the output power of the femtosecond laser. We fitted the OA Z-scan traces presented by solid spheres in Fig. 13 with the theoretical simulation using Eq. (2), and we fitted the CA Z-scan traces presented by solid spheres in Fig. 14 with the theoretical simulation using Eqs. (3)(5). Also, the composite films demonstrate RSA behavior and a self-defocusing phenomenon akin to the GO film. The parameter β was extracted for various films via theoretical fits using Eq. (2). To determine the NLR coefficient (n2) of the samples, ΔΦ values were extracted by using Eq. (5) to further calculate n2 values from the relation ΔΦ = 2πn2I0Leff/λ. The NLR and NLA coefficients are respectively related to the real and imaginary parts of the third-order nonlinear susceptibility χ3 by
(6)
(7)
where ɛ0 is the vacuum dielectric constant, c is the speed of light, n0 is the linear refractive index of the medium, and λ is the laser wavelength. Therefore, the value of χ3 can be extracted by
(8)
FIG. 13.

Open-hole Z-scanning results for films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 13.

Open-hole Z-scanning results for films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal
FIG. 14.

Closed-hole Z-scanning results for films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

FIG. 14.

Closed-hole Z-scanning results for films of (a) GO, (b) GO + Ni NPs, (c) GO + Fe NPs, and (d) GO + Ag NPs.

Close modal

The results of the OA and CA experiments are summarized in Table III. As can be seen, for the GO–MNP composite films, Iχ3 is two orders of magnitude larger than Rχ3, which means that the absorption effect is stronger than the refraction effect.51 In addition, the RSA behavior and self-defocusing effects of all GO–MNP composite films are improved compared with the original GO. The β and n2 values for GO + Ni NPs are 7.8 × 10−6 cm/W and −1.06 × 10−12 cm2/W, respectively, and the NLA and self-defocusing effects are increased by 2.3 times and 1.5 times, respectively. The β and n2 values for GO + Fe NPs are 8.9 × 10−6 cm/W and −1.48 × 10−12 cm2/W, respectively, and the NLA and self-defocusing effects are increased by 2.6 times and 2 times, respectively. The β and n2 values for GO + Ag NPs are 9.9 × 10−6 cm/W and −1.19 × 10−12 cm2/W, respectively, and the NLA and self-defocusing effects are increased by 2.9 times and 1.7 times, respectively. The enhancement of nonlinear RSA and NLR indicates the existence of light-induced electron transfer and energy transfer between the GO and MNPs. This leads to an exceptionally robust synergistic coupling effect, thereby bolstering the interaction between light and matter. The electron transfer pathways from MNPs to GO are shown by the energy band diagram in Fig. 15. GO contains the sp2 matrix of graphene and the sp3 matrix of oxygen-containing groups, while MNPs generally attach to it through oxygen-containing groups. Upon irradiation of the GO–MNP composite with a femtosecond laser pulse of 515-nm wavelength, the metal’s irradiated region generates free electrons that are subsequently transferred to GO via the interface charge. The free carrier lifetime is increased, which further enhances the TPA in the composite compared to that in GO, thus exhibiting enhanced nonlinear properties. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no research reports on the NLO properties of GO–Ni-NP and GO–Fe-NP composites. The results for the NLO parameters presented herein are very satisfactory, and compared with previous studies, the GO–Ag-NP composites presented herein exhibit notable enhancements in NLA.

TABLE III.

Nonlinear parameters of GO, GO + Ni NPs, GO + Fe NPs, and GO + Ag NPs.

Sampleβ (cm/W)n2 (cm2/W)Imχ3 (esu)Reχ3 (esu)|χ3| (esu)
GO 3.4 × 10−6 −7.18 × 10−13 6.8 × 10−10 −3.57 × 10−11 6.8 × 10−10 
GO + Ni NPs 7.8 × 10−6 −1.06 × 10−12 1.56 × 10−9 −5.27 × 10−11 1.56 × 10−9 
GO + Fe NPs 8.9 × 10−6 −1.48 × 10−12 1.78 × 10−9 −7.35 × 10−11 1.78 × 10−9 
GO + Ag NPs 9.9 × 10−6 −1.19 × 10−12 1.98 × 10−9 −5.91 × 10−11 1.98 × 10−9 
Sampleβ (cm/W)n2 (cm2/W)Imχ3 (esu)Reχ3 (esu)|χ3| (esu)
GO 3.4 × 10−6 −7.18 × 10−13 6.8 × 10−10 −3.57 × 10−11 6.8 × 10−10 
GO + Ni NPs 7.8 × 10−6 −1.06 × 10−12 1.56 × 10−9 −5.27 × 10−11 1.56 × 10−9 
GO + Fe NPs 8.9 × 10−6 −1.48 × 10−12 1.78 × 10−9 −7.35 × 10−11 1.78 × 10−9 
GO + Ag NPs 9.9 × 10−6 −1.19 × 10−12 1.98 × 10−9 −5.91 × 10−11 1.98 × 10−9 
FIG. 15.

Energy band diagram of GO–MNP composite and electron pathways.

FIG. 15.

Energy band diagram of GO–MNP composite and electron pathways.

Close modal

In this work, we systematically investigated the LO and NLO properties of GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP composite films. LSCM, SEM, EDS, and XRD data were analyzed to confirm the successful loading of MNPs on GO films. The electron interactions between MNPs and GO were studied by Raman spectroscopy. The results of UV–visible spectra showed that the different electronic interactions between different metal particles and GO can effectively regulate the band gap of GO. By adjusting the band gap of GO, the properties of GO composites can be controlled, which is of great significance for photovoltaic devices, photoelectric sensors, and optical communications and provides a theoretical basis for the preparation of integrated optoelectronic devices.

The NLO properties of GO and its composite films under femtosecond pulsed laser excitation were studied by the Z-scan technique. The optical limiting properties of GO films exhibit intensity dependence when exposed to femtosecond laser pulses. Importantly, we reported for the first time on the NLO properties of GO–Ni-NP and GO–Fe-NP composite films, and their β values are increased by 2.3 and 2.6 times, respectively. The NLA of the GO–Ag-NP composite membrane that we reported exhibited a notable enhancement, showing an increase of 2.9 times in the β value. Because of the strong synergistic coupling effect between MNPs and GO, the NLO properties of the composite are significantly improved. The synthesized GO–Ni-NP, GO–Fe-NP, and GO–Ag-NP composites are promising NLO materials that can be safely applied as effective optical limiters in a variety of military and medical operations to protect photosensitive devices from damage by strong light pulses. These composites have potential applications in all-optical switches and optical limiters, providing new possibilities for the application of optical limiters, optical modulation, and optical switches.

See the supplementary material for the modified Hummer’s method for graphene oxide.

This study was funded by the Henan Key Laboratory of Intelligent Manufacturing Equipment Integration for Superhard Materials (Grant No. JDKJ2022-01) and the Key Lab of Modern Optical Technologies of Education Ministry of China, Soochow University.

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

1.
Bonaccorso
F
,
Sun
Z
,
Hasan
T
,
Ferrari
AC
.
Graphene photonics and optoelectronics
.
Nat Photonics
2010
;
4
(
9
):
611
622
.
2.
Gao
W
,
Singh
N
,
Song
L
,
Liu
Z
,
Reddy
ALM
,
Ci
L
,
Vajtai
R
,
Zhang
Q
,
Wei
B
,
Ajayan
PM
.
Direct laser writing of micro-supercapacitors on hydrated graphite oxide films
.
Nat Nanotechnol
2011
;
6
(
8
):
496
500
.
3.
El-Kady
MF
,
Strong
V
,
Dubin
S
,
Kaner
RB
.
Laser scribing of high-performance and flexible graphene-based electrochemical capacitors
.
Science
2012
;
335
(
6074
):
1326
1330
.
4.
Liu
J
,
Yin
Z
,
Cao
X
,
Zhao
F
,
Wang
L
,
Huang
W
,
Zhang
H
.
Fabrication of flexible, all-reduced graphene oxide non-volatile memory devices
.
Adv Mater
2012
;
25
(
2
):
233
238
.
5.
Deng
S
,
Tjoa
V
,
Fan
HM
,
Tan
HR
,
Sayle
DC
,
Olivo
M
,
Mhaisalkar
S
,
Wei
J
,
Sow
CH
.
Reduced graphene oxide conjugated Cu2O nanowire mesocrystals for high-performance NO2 gas sensor
.
J Am Chem Soc.
2012
;
134
(
10
):
4905
4917
.
6.
Eda
G
,
Fanchini
G
,
Chhowalla
M
.
Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material
.
Nat Nanotechnol
2008
;
3
(
5
):
270
274
.
7.
Li
F
,
Jiang
X
,
Zhao
J
,
Zhang
S
.
Graphene oxide: A promising nanomaterial for energy and environmental applications
.
Nano energy
2015
;
16
:
488
515
.
8.
Hunt
A
,
Kurmaev
EZ
,
Moewes
A
.
Band gap engineering of graphene oxide by chemical modification
.
Carbon
2014
;
75
:
366
371
.
9.
Johari
P
,
Shenoy
VB
.
Modulating optical properties of graphene oxide: Role of prominent functional groups
.
ACS Nano
2011
;
5
(
9
):
7640
7647
.
10.
Eda
G
,
Mattevi
C
,
Yamaguchi
H
,
Kim
H
,
Chhowalla
M
.
Insulator to semimetal transition in graphene oxide
.
J Phys Chem C
2009
;
113
(
35
):
15768
15771
.
11.
Yamashita
S
.
Nonlinear optics in carbon nanotube, graphene, and related 2D materials
.
APL Photonics
2019
;
4
(
3
).
12.
Zhang
Y
,
Wu
J
,
Jia
L
,
Qu
Y
,
Yang
Y
,
Jia
B
,
Moss
DJ
.
Graphene oxide for nonlinear integrated photonics
.
Laser Photonics Rev
2023
;
17
(
3
):
2200512
.
13.
Wu
J
,
Jia
L
,
Zhang
Y
,
Qu
Y
,
Jia
B
,
Moss
DJ
.
Graphene oxide for integrated photonics and flat optics
.
Adv Mater
2021
;
33
(
3
):
2006415
.
14.
Autere
A
,
Jussila
H
,
Dai
Y
,
Wang
Y
,
Lipsanen
H
,
Sun
Z
.
Nonlinear optics with 2D layered materials
.
Adv Mater
2018
;
30
(
24
):
1705963
.
15.
Jiang
XF
,
Polavarapu
L
,
Neo
ST
,
Venkatesan
T
,
Xu
QH
.
Graphene oxides as tunable broadband nonlinear optical materials for femtosecond laser pulses
.
J Phys Chem Lett
2012
;
3
(
6
):
785
790
.
16.
Ma
X
,
Wang
Y
,
Hao
X
,
Gu
M
,
Zhang
Q
.
Giant nonlinear optical response of graphene oxide thin films under the photochemical and photothermal reduction
.
Adv Mater Interfaces
2022
;
9
(
21
):
2200890
.
17.
Hao
Y
,
Yang
L
,
Li
J
,
Xing
R
,
Gu
Y
.
Third-order nonlinear optical properties of CuS/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites
.
Eur Phys J Appl Phys
2021
;
94
(
2
):
20401
.
18.
Fraser
S
,
Zheng
X
,
Qiu
L
,
Li
D
,
Jia
B
.
Enhanced optical nonlinearities of hybrid graphene oxide films functionalized with gold nanoparticles
.
Appl Phys Lett.
2015
;
107
(
3
):
031112
.
19.
Kimiagar
S
,
Abrinaei
F
.
Effect of temperature on the structural, linear, and nonlinear optical properties of MgO-doped graphene oxide nanocomposites
.
Nanophotonics
2018
;
7
(
1
):
243
251
.
20.
Mungse
HP
,
Khatri
OP
.
Chemically functionalized reduced graphene oxide as a novel material for reduction of friction and wear
.
J Phys Chem C
2014
;
118
(
26
):
14394
14402
.
21.
Dobrota
AS
,
Pašti
IA
,
Mentus
SV
,
Skorodumova
NV
.
A general view on the reactivity of the oxygen-functionalized graphene basal plane
.
Phys Chem Chem Phys.
2016
;
18
(
9
):
6580
6586
.
22.
Heidari
B
,
Ghamsari
MS
,
Salmani
S
,
Ahmadi
M
,
Majles‐Ara
MH
.
Reduced graphene oxide thin film with strong optical nonlinearity
.
Phys Status Solidi B
2021
;
258
(
3
):
2000397
.
23.
Cheng
Y
,
Li
H
,
Fang
C
,
Ai
L
,
Chen
J
,
Su
J
,
Zhang
Q
,
Fu
Q
.
Facile synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/silver nanoparticles composites and their application for detecting heavy metal ions
.
J Alloys Compd
2019
;
787
:
683
693
.
24.
Ji
Z
,
Shen
X
,
Zhu
G
,
Zhou
H
,
Yuan
A
.
Reduced graphene oxide/nickel nanocomposites: Facile synthesis, magnetic and catalytic properties
.
J Mater Chem.
2012
;
22
(
8
):
3471
3477
.
25.
Motamedi
E
,
Talebi Atouei
M
,
Kassaee
MZ
.
Comparison of nitrate removal from water via graphene oxide coated Fe, Ni and Co nanoparticles
.
Mater Res Bull
2014
;
54
:
34
40
.
26.
Xu
C
,
Wang
X
.
Fabrication of flexible metal‐nanoparticle films using graphene oxide sheets as substrates
.
Small
2009
;
5
(
19
):
2212
2217
.
27.
Malard
LM
,
Pimenta
MA
,
Dresselhaus
G
,
Dresselhaus
MS
.
Raman spectroscopy in graphene
.
Phys Rep
2009
;
473
(
5–6
):
51
87
.
28.
Rao
R
,
Tishler
D
,
Katoch
J
,
Ishigami
M
.
Multiphonon Raman scattering in graphene
.
Phys Rev B
2011
;
84
(
11
):
113406
.
29.
Childres
I
,
Jauregui
LA
,
Park
W
,
Cao
H
,
Chen
YP
.
Raman spectroscopy of graphene and related materials
.
New Dev Photon Mater Res
2013
;
1
:
1
20
.
30.
Jorio
A
,
Saito
R
.
Raman spectroscopy for carbon nanotube applications
.
J Appl Phys
2021
;
129
(
2
):
27
.
31.
Subrahmanyam
KS
,
Manna
AK
,
Pati
SK
,
Rao
CNR
.
A study of graphene decorated with metal nanoparticles
.
Chem Phys Lett
2010
;
497
(
1–3
):
70
75
.
32.
Das
B
,
Voggu
R
,
Rout
CS
,
Rao
CNR
.
Changes in the electronic structure and properties of graphene induced by molecular charge-transfer
.
Chem Commun
2008
(
41
):
5155
5157
.
33.
Voggu
R
,
Das
B
,
Rout
CS
,
Rao
CNR
.
Effects of charge transfer interaction of graphene with electron donor and acceptor molecules examined using Raman spectroscopy and cognate techniques
.
J Phys Condens Matter
2008
;
20
(
47
):
472204
.
34.
Wang
H
,
Wang
Y
,
Cao
X
,
Feng
M
,
Lan
G
.
Vibrational properties of graphene and graphene layers
.
J Raman Spectrosc
2009
;
40
(
12
):
1791
1796
.
35.
de Lima
AH
,
Tavares
CT
,
da Cunha
CCS
,
Vicentini
NC
,
Carvalho
GR
,
Fragneaud
B
,
Maciel
IO
,
Legnani
C
,
Quirino
WG
,
de Oliveira
LFC
, et al.
Origin of optical bandgap fluctuations in graphene oxide
.
Eur Phys J B
2020
;
93
(
6
):
105
.
36.
Li
J
,
Liu
CY
. Ag/Graphene Heterostructures: Synthesis, Characterization and Optical Properties.
Wiley Online Library
.
2010
.
37.
Xu
Z
,
Gao
H
,
Guoxin
H
.
Solution-based synthesis and characterization of a silver nanoparticle–graphene hybrid film
.
Carbon
2011
;
49
(
14
):
4731
4738
.
38.
Siwach
OP
,
Sen
P
.
Fluorescence properties of Fe nanoparticles prepared by electro-explosion of wires
.
Mater Sci Eng B
2008
;
149
(
1
):
99
104
.
39.
Jaleh
B
,
Torkamany
MJ
,
Golbedaghi
R
,
Noroozi
M
,
Habibi
S
,
Samavat
F
,
Hamedan
VJ
,
Albeheshti
L
.
Preparation of nickel nanoparticles via laser ablation in liquid and simultaneously spectroscopy
.
Adv Mater Res
2011
;
403–408
:
4440
4444
.
40.
Aguilar-Moreno
GS
,
Espinosa-Solares
T
,
Santos-Gaspar
JM
,
Montes-Ramírez
E
,
Aguilar-Méndez
,
Martinez-Maestro
L
,
Navarro-Cerón
E
.
Synthesis and characterization of NaGdF4:Nd3+@Ni core@shell nanoparticles with potential applications in anaerobic digestion
.
Dig J Nanomater Biostructures
2023
;
18
(
3
):
1093
.
41.
Lim
J
,
Rani
J
,
Choi
K
,
Kim
JH
,
Jun
SC
.
Optical modification of atomic thickness graphene oxide
.
Int Soc Opt Photon
2012
;
10
:
004520
.
42.
Guo
L
,
Shao
RQ
,
Zhang
YL
,
Jiang
HB
,
Li
XB
,
Xie
SY
,
Xu
BB
,
Chen
QD
,
Song
JF
,
Sun
HB
.
Bandgap tailoring and synchronous microdevices patterning of graphene oxides
.
J Phys Chem C
2012
;
116
(
5
):
3594
3599
.
43.
Jadhav
ST
,
Rajoba
SJ
,
Patil
SA
,
Han
SH
,
Jadhav
LD
.
Temperature-dependent photoluminescence of graphene oxide
.
J Electron Mater
2016
;
45
:
379
385
.
44.
Abdel-Salam
AI
,
Gomaa
I
,
Khalid
A
,
Soliman
TS
.
Investigation of Raman spectrum, structural, morphological, and optical features of Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanocomposites
.
Phys Scr
2022
;
97
(
12
):
125807
.
45.
Zainab
S
,
Azeem
M
,
Awan
SU
,
Rizwan
S
,
Iqbal
N
,
Rashid
J
.
Optimization of bandgap reduction in 2-dimensional GO nanosheets and nanocomposites of GO/iron-oxide for electronic device applications
.
Sci Rep
2023
;
13
(
1
):
6954
.
46.
Kachere
AR
,
Kakade
PM
,
Kanwade
AR
,
Dani
P
,
Mandlik
NT
,
Rondiya
SR
,
Dzade
NY
, et al.
Zinc oxide/graphene oxide nanocomposites: Synthesis, characterization and their optical properties
.
ES Mater Manuf
2021
;
16
:
19
29
.
47.
Rehman
AU
,
Aslam
M
,
Shahid
I
,
Idrees
M
,
Khan
AD
,
Batool
S
,
Khan
M
.
Enhancing the light absorption in dye-sensitized solar cell by using bilayer composite materials based photo-anode
.
Opt Commun
2020
;
477
:
126353
.
48.
Ghofraniha
N
,
Conti
C
.
Graphene oxide photonics
.
J Opt
2019
;
21
(
5
):
053001
.
49.
Chapple
PB
,
Staromlynska
J
,
Hermann
JA
,
Mckay
TJ
,
Mcduff
RG
.
Single-beam Z-scan: Measurement techniques and analysis
.
J Nonlinear Opt Phys Mater
1997
;
06
(
03
):
251
293
.
50.
Guo
SL
,
Xu
L
,
Yan
J
,
Wang
HT
,
You
XZ
,
Ming
NB
.
An accurate method for extracting nonlinear refraction by Z-scan technique in the presence of nonlinear absorption
.
J Nonlinear Opt Phys Mater
2003
;
12
(
03
):
307
315
.
51.
Yan
L
,
Zhang
J
,
Wang
M
,
Nie
Z
.
Boosting optical nonlinearities of graphene oxide films by laser direct writing
.
Opt Mater
2022
;
128
:
112454
.

Qingqing Sun is studying for a master’s degree at the State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments in the School of Precision Instruments and Opto-Electronics Engineering at Tianjin University in China. Her research interests include nonlinear optics, femtosecond laser processing, and semiconductor Raman spectroscopy.

Bing Dong is studying for a doctorate at the State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments in the School of Precision Instruments and Opto-Electronics Engineering at Tianjin University. His research interests are femtosecond laser processing and semiconductor Raman spectroscopy.

Ying Song is studying for a doctorate at the State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments in the School of Precision Instruments and Opto-Electronics Engineering at Tianjin University. Her research interests include the preparation of silicon carbide color centers by ion implantation, three-dimensional Raman and photoluminescence spectral characterization, and models of spectral depth profiling.

Jianshi Wang is studying for a master’s degree at the State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments in the School of Precision Instruments and Opto-Electronics Engineering at Tianjin University. His research interests include ultrafast femtosecond laser processing, Raman spectroscopy, and nanoparticle fabrication.

Mengzhi Yan is studying for a master’s degree at the State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments in the School of Precision Instruments and Opto-Electronics Engineering at Tianjin University. His research interests include heuristic algorithms, molecular-dynamics simulation, and detecting defects in the ultrawide-band-gap semiconductor material gallium oxide by machine learning.

Zongwei Xu is a Professor at Tianjin University and a Doctoral Supervisor. His research interests include ultra-fast energy beam (ion, laser) processing, Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy characterization, wide-bandgap semiconductor devices, micro-cutting tools, and nano-cutting technology.

Supplementary Material