Empirical rules play a crucial role in industrial and experimental settings for efficiently determining the rheological properties of materials, thereby saving both time and resources. An example is the Cox–Merz rule, which equates the steady-shear viscosity with the magnitude of the complex viscosity obtained in oscillatory tests. This empirical rule provides access to the steady-shear viscosity that is useful for processing conditions without the instabilities associated with experiments at high shear rates. However, the Cox–Merz rule is empirical and has been shown to work in some cases and fail in others. The underlying connection between the different material functions remains phenomenological and the lack of a comprehensive understanding of the rheological physics allows for ambiguity to persist in the interpretation of material responses. In this work, we revisit the Cox–Merz rule using recovery rheology, which decomposes the strain into recoverable and unrecoverable components. When viewed through the lens of recovery rheology, it is clearly seen that the steady-shear viscosity comes from purely unrecoverable acquisition of strain, while the complex viscosity is defined in terms of contributions from both recoverable and unrecoverable components. With recovery tests in mind, we elucidate why the Cox–Merz rule works only in a limited set of conditions and present an approach that could allow for universal comparisons to be made. This work further highlights the significance of recovery rheology by showing how it is possible to extend beyond phenomenological approaches through clear rheophysical metrics obtained by decomposing the material response into recoverable and unrecoverable components.
Skip Nav Destination
A reexamination of the Cox–Merz rule through the lens of recovery rheology
,
,
CHORUS
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 2024
A reexamination of the Cox–Merz rule through the lens of recovery rheology
Available to Purchase
Yul Hui Shim
;
Yul Hui Shim
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
James J. Griebler
;
James J. Griebler
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Search for other works by this author on:
Simon A. Rogers
Simon A. Rogers
a)
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
, Urbana, Illinois 61801a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; electronic mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Yul Hui Shim
James J. Griebler
Simon A. Rogers
a)
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
, Urbana, Illinois 61801
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; electronic mail: [email protected]
J. Rheol. 68, 381–396 (2024)
Article history
Received:
December 21 2023
Accepted:
March 10 2024
Citation
Yul Hui Shim, James J. Griebler, Simon A. Rogers; A reexamination of the Cox–Merz rule through the lens of recovery rheology. J. Rheol. 1 May 2024; 68 (3): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000811
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Recoverable strain in amorphous materials: The role of ongoing plastic events following initial elastic recoil
Henry A. Lockwood, Suzanne M. Fielding
Linear viscoelasticity of nanocolloidal suspensions from probe rheology molecular simulations
Dinesh Sundaravadivelu Devarajan, Rajesh Khare
Related Content
Cox–Merz rules from general rigid bead-rod theory
Physics of Fluids (September 2023)
Translation-orientation coupling and Cox-Merz rule of liquid hexane
J. Chem. Phys. (November 2018)
The Cox–Merz rule extended: A rheological model for concentrated suspensions and other materials with a yield stress
J. Rheol. (May 1991)
Validity of the Cox–Merz rule for concentrated suspensions
J. Rheol. (July 2003)