The literature on this subject stands currently at over 100 articles; this review seeks to present an overall picture of the subject, using the results of these articles. Concentrated suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles, if measured in the appropriate shear rate range, will always show (reversible) shear thickening. The actual nature of the shear thickening will depend on the parameters of the suspended phase: phase volume, particle size (distribution), particle shape, as well as those of the suspending phase (viscosity and the details of the deformation, i.e., shear or extensional flow, steady or transient, time and rate of deformation). The explanations offered for the phenomenon that are supported by independent physical measurements postulate that the increase in viscosity is due to the transition from a two‐dimensional layered arrangement of particles to a random three‐dimensional form. The transition rarely takes more than one decade of shear rate, but it can be over a much shorter range, making the increase quite dramatic. These factors of course depend strongly on the particle and fluid parameters. For a suspension of monodisperse spheres suspended in a low viscosity fluid (1–10 mPa⋅s), the onset of shear thickening is very dependent on the sphere diameter, approximately according to an inverse quadratic relationship, with the value for 10 μm spheres being about in steady shear and so on. The severity of the shear thickening depends on the concentration, in proportion to some maximum packing fraction which is itself partly controlled by the form of the particle size distribution. The particle shape is also important. The extent of the phenomenon can be greatly reduced by either reducing the particle size, thus delaying the onset to higher shear rate, or by using a mixture of particle sizes. This latter procedure changes the onset condition, and reduces the severity by increasing the maximum packing fraction of the suspended material.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 1989
Research Article|
February 01 1989
Shear‐Thickening (“Dilatancy”) in Suspensions of Nonaggregating Solid Particles Dispersed in Newtonian Liquids
H. A. Barnes
H. A. Barnes
Unilever Research, Port Sunlight Laboratory, Bebington, Wirral, Merseyside, England L63 3JW
Search for other works by this author on:
H. A. Barnes
Unilever Research, Port Sunlight Laboratory, Bebington, Wirral, Merseyside, England L63 3JW
J. Rheol. 33, 329–366 (1989)
Citation
H. A. Barnes; Shear‐Thickening (“Dilatancy”) in Suspensions of Nonaggregating Solid Particles Dispersed in Newtonian Liquids. J. Rheol. 1 February 1989; 33 (2): 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.550017
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Rheo-SINDy: Finding a constitutive model from rheological data for complex fluids using sparse identification for nonlinear dynamics
Takeshi Sato, Souta Miyamoto, et al.
No yield stress required: Stress-activated flow in simple yield-stress fluids
G. Pagani, M. Hofmann, et al.
Linear viscoelasticity of nanocolloidal suspensions from probe rheology molecular simulations
Dinesh Sundaravadivelu Devarajan, Rajesh Khare
Related Content
Micromechanical modeling of discontinuous shear thickening in granular media-fluid suspension
J. Rheol. (March 2017)
Material properties of the shear-thickened state in concentrated near hard-sphere colloidal dispersions
J. Rheol. (July 2014)
The role of dilation and confining stresses in shear thickening of dense suspensions
J. Rheol. (July 2012)
Dilatancy in dense suspensions of model hard-sphere-like colloids under shear and extensional flow
J. Rheol. (September 2020)
Rheological Behavior of Dilatant (Shear‐Thickening) Fluids. Part II. Mechanism and Theory
Transactions of The Society of Rheology (March 1968)