Since 1950, experimenters have been trying to measure the electron’s electric dipole moment de and getting increasingly stringent upper limits—but no clear signal. In the early days, the quest seemed dubious because a de would break symmetries that were then thought to be inviolate. By the mid 1960s it was clear that those symmetries are in fact broken. But the standard model of particle theory, which incorporates the known symmetry violations, predicts a de of about 10−38 e·cm, far too small to measure. However, attempts to progress beyond the manifestly incomplete standard model predict much higher de magnitudes that should be measurable with molecular-beam techniques. Now the ACME collaboration reports a new null result from a particularly sensitive experiment that uses a thorium oxide beam. Polarizing a ThO molecule provides an enormously strong intramolecular electric field in which to look for energy shifts attributable to de. Having found none, the ACME team sets a new upper limit of 10−28 e·cm on de. That’s an order of magnitude lower than the previous limit set just three years ago. The new limit puts severe constraints on supersymmetric theories and other proposed extensions of the standard model that posit a de attributable to new particles with masses of a few hundred GeV—the energy regime in which the underlying unity of the weak and electromagnetic interactions is broken. The new de limit pushes the masses of the new particles into the multi-TeV range, where they are unlikely to be found by CERN’s Large Hadron Collider or by the next generation of electron–positron colliders. (J. Baron et al., Science 343, 269, 2014.)—Bertram M. Schwarzschild
Skip Nav Destination
A table-top experiment addresses issues crucial to high-energy physics.
© 2014 American Institute of Physics

Looking for the electron’s electric dipole moment Free
4 March 2014
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.5.7052
Content License:FreeView
EISSN:1945-0699
Topics:
Q&A: Tam O’Shaughnessy honors Sally Ride’s courage and character
Jenessa Duncombe
Ballooning in Albuquerque: What’s so special?
Michael Anand
Comments on early space controversies
W. David Cummings; Louis J. Lanzerotti