Palmer replies: While plausible, of course, the model of Roger Pielke, Bo-Wen Shen, and Xubin Zeng is nevertheless heuristic: As mentioned in my article, no rigorous proof or disproof of the real butterfly effect exists. Indeed, in contrast with the paper by Pielke and his coauthors,1 recent published work2 on spontaneous stochasticity in high Reynolds number flows (see reference 7 in my article) suggests that not only may macroscopic circulations be sensitive to flaps of butterflies’ wings in finite time, but they may also be sensitive to the motions of individual molecules.

1.
R. A.
Pielke
Sr
,
B.-W.
Shen
,
X.
Zeng
,
Weatherwise
77
(
3
),
14
(
2024
).
2.
D.
Bandak
,
A. A.
Mailybaev
,
G. L.
Eyink
,
N.
Goldenfeld
,
Phys. Rev. Lett.
132
,
104002
(
2024
).
3.
R.
Pielke
,
B.-W.
Shen
,
X.
Zeng
,
Phys. Today
77
(
9
),
10
(
2024
).