Vavagiakis, Bachlechner, and Kleban reply: Fritz Bopp correctly points out that creating a potential difference necessitates a nonzero electric field. He goes on to assert that the field must cross the particles’ paths, differentially accelerating them. If that were the case, the difference in phase could indeed be explained by the interaction of the particles with the electric field. As we describe in our Quick Study, however, the field could be switched on for a while and then off again while the particles are deep inside two long, tubular Faraday cages. Those cages shield the particles from contact with the nonzero field, yet while the field is on, there is a potential difference between the interiors of the two cages. That potential difference is therefore responsible for the difference in phase.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 01 2022
Revisiting the electric potential Free
Eve Vavagiakis;
Eve Vavagiakis
([email protected]) Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas Bachlechner;
Thomas Bachlechner
([email protected]) MeetElise, New York City
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew Kleban
Matthew Kleban
([email protected]) New York University, New York City
Search for other works by this author on:
Eve Vavagiakis
([email protected]) Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Thomas Bachlechner
([email protected]) MeetElise, New York City
Matthew Kleban
([email protected]) New York University, New York City
Physics Today 75 (8), 13 (2022);
Citation
Eve Vavagiakis, Thomas Bachlechner, Matthew Kleban; Revisiting the electric potential. Physics Today 1 August 2022; 75 (8): 13. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.5054
Download citation file:
732
Views
Citing articles via
Q&A: Tam O’Shaughnessy honors Sally Ride’s courage and character
Jenessa Duncombe
Ballooning in Albuquerque: What’s so special?
Michael Anand
Comments on early space controversies
W. David Cummings; Louis J. Lanzerotti