Kleppner replies: I thank Donald Morton for calling to my attention the measurements of a number of hot stars in the 1970s. My comment that the Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) effect was never “particularly important” for astronomy reflected Hanbury Brown’s own assessment of his accomplishment. I believe that my comment is defensible if the impact of intensity interferometry on astronomy is compared with, for instance, the impact of very long baseline interferometry. Vittorio Degiorgio quite correctly points out that intensity correlations have long been a tool for studying critical phenomena. The early controversy about the HBT effect centered on two-particle correlations, however, and not on intensity correlations. The goal of my essay was to point out the interesting manifestations of two-particle correlations in atomic fluids.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 01 2009
Hanbury Brown and Twiss: Important, anti-weird, beautiful Free
Daniel Kleppner
Daniel Kleppner
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Kleppner
Physics Today 62 (3), 10–12 (2009);
Citation
Daniel Kleppner; Hanbury Brown and Twiss: Important, anti-weird, beautiful. Physics Today 1 March 2009; 62 (3): 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4797078
Download citation file:
385
Views
Citing articles via
Q&A: Tam O’Shaughnessy honors Sally Ride’s courage and character
Jenessa Duncombe
Ballooning in Albuquerque: What’s so special?
Michael Anand
Comments on early space controversies
W. David Cummings; Louis J. Lanzerotti