Gronenborn replies: My comment comparing nuclear magnetic resonance and x-ray crystallography as structural techniques was intended to highlight the younger nature of NMR versus crystallography. Crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists worth their salt would never advocate blind use of technologies without a thorough understanding of their basic principles, strengths, and limitations. Problems arising from loose interpretation and misuse of technology without critical analysis of the origin, quality, and reproducibility of generated data are, unfortunately, too common. But not every scientist is a methods developer or is, as David Kramer puts it in his report, well “conversant in the technology.” Success in the complex structural-biology tasks that lie ahead can be ensured only through rigorous education and training of students to critically and carefully use all methodologies available.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 01 2009
Imaging technologies need trained practitioners Free
Angela M. Gronenborn
Angela M. Gronenborn
Search for other works by this author on:
Angela M. Gronenborn
Physics Today 62 (1), 8 (2009);
Citation
Angela M. Gronenborn; Imaging technologies need trained practitioners. Physics Today 1 January 2009; 62 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4796976
Download citation file:
204
Views
Citing articles via
Q&A: Tam O’Shaughnessy honors Sally Ride’s courage and character
Jenessa Duncombe
Ballooning in Albuquerque: What’s so special?
Michael Anand
Comments on early space controversies
W. David Cummings; Louis J. Lanzerotti