Many of us in academia may feel discouraged by the persistence of gender discrimination in science and math after reading Toni Feder’s reports “Why Women Leave Academic Physics” (Physics Today, May 2005, page 32) and “No Leaky Pipeline for Women in Physics, but Discrimination Persists” (Physics Today, April 2005, page 28). However, professors and students of science around the globe—both male and female—should be pleased that Susan Hockfield took the helm of MIT, a world-renowned physical-sciences authority. Working in a research group supervised by a female leader, I was excited to learn that two women were promoted to head the University of Toronto’s prestigious faculties of law and medicine.
Although men have historically dominated the upper echelons of academia, the fact that more and more women are taking on high-powered positions in top-tier academic institutions not only inspires hope that the traditionally male-dominated field of science is undergoing a radical shift toward gender equality, but also suggests that women are not, as has been suggested by some, less capable than men, either biologically or psychologically.
Former Harvard University president Lawrence Summers was forced to resign after stating that the innate genetic differences between men and women account for the preponderance of men in math- and science-related careers. While it is undeniable that science is a male-dominated field and that there are indeed genetic differences between men and women, the latter does not explain the former. To the contrary, it has been established that women excel at a variety of tasks that relate to language and articulation. 1 In addition, females tend to outperform males at fine-motor activities, particularly those involving rapid, repetitive temporal sequencing, 2 making them more efficient at mastering laboratory skills.
What, then, is holding women back?
Although the answer to that question is highly complex and deeply rooted in societal expectations, it is important to consider whether an ideal leader possesses qualities that more closely resemble the attributes intrinsic to men or to women. The answer, I believe, is that the ideal leader possesses both. If one believes that a fully functional family requires equal contributions from a father and a mother, the same should hold true for larger institutions, from a university to an entire country.
