Garrison replies: I hope I did not say there is a “gap” in our ability to date the late to mid-Pleistocene. I hoped to imply that there was a real gap, in the recent past, that I estimated to be about 500 ka—a singularly awkward time interval, since it is when the real evolution of anatomically modern humans (AMH) occurred. The present-day suite of dating techniques—uranium disequilibrium series; thermoluminescence (TL) and optical-stimulated luminescence; electron-spin resonance; and fission track—together with radiocarbon and argon/argon, now offer archaeologists a range of methods mostly unavailable or “unrecognized” before the last quarter of the 20th century.

I disagree with Karner on the revolutionary role of accelerator mass spectrometry-radiocarbon. AMS is sensitive to parts per quadrillion levels, but that still will not get us dates beyond the 50-ka limit, even with smaller samples. It is certainly a boon in limiting the destruction of rare and important archaeological specimens. AMS did give us the 24-ka age of the Neanderthal child found on the Iberian Peninsula, which raised issues of genetic mixing of AMH and Neanderthal. 1 New AMS dates for AMH and Neanderthal remains found at the Balkan sites of Hrvatsko Zajorje, Velika Pecina, and Vindija G1 2 raise the same issues in Europe proper for the same period.

As to uncertainties in TL ages, a recent study 3 has produced a remarkable correspondence between TL dates and tree-ring results—40% (6 of 15) from the same-site context. Likewise, three of the remaining samples were seen to be correspondent by use of bridging arguments for the dendrochronological data. Not bad.

As to Carl Swisher’s professional attribution, I can only repeat what I read in the journals. Proper credit is due any benefactors responsible for dating, or redating, Java Man. No slight was intended.

1.
C.
Duarte
 et al.,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96
,
7604
(
1999
).
2.
F. H.
Smith
 et al.,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96
,
12281
(
1999
).
3.
D. D.
Dykeman
,
R. H.
Towner
,
J. K.
Feathers
,
Am. Antiq.
67
,
145
(
2002
).