The December 2009 issue of PHYSICS TODAY (page 8) had an interesting letter exchange on environmental effects in the Alberta tar sands—especially on the impacts of oil development on birds. In response to a letter, Murray Gray, Zhenghe Xu, and Jacob Masliyah, authors of the original article on the subject (PHYSICS TODAY, March 2009, page 31), wrote that claims of the specific adverse effects on birds and bird habitat were “grossly exaggerated,” as though the claims focused only on the effects of mining and the tailings ponds that store waste products. Yet the Natural Resources Defense Council study to which the article authors seem to refer also reviewed the current and potential future effects of fragmentation from in situ drilling, water withdrawal, air and water toxins, and global warming.1 The harmful effects of tar-sands operations on birds nesting in the region are very real and will...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 2011
February 01 2011
Oil sands and the environment
Susan Casey‑Lefkowitz
Susan Casey‑Lefkowitz
([email protected])
Natural Resources Defense Council
Washington, DC
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 64 (2), 9 (2011);
Citation
Susan Casey‑Lefkowitz; Oil sands and the environment. Physics Today 1 February 2011; 64 (2): 9. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3554327
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
90
Views
Citing articles via
The lessons learned from ephemeral nuclei
Witold Nazarewicz; Lee G. Sobotka
FYI science policy briefs
Lindsay McKenzie; Jacob Taylor