This past summer, at a large international scientific meeting where every contributed talk was allowed 20 minutes, I wandered into a session that seemed intriguing but dealt with a topic about which I knew nothing. After a few hours, I had heard several incomprehensible talks, a couple that justified my intrigue, and one from a fellow who spent 15 of his 20 minutes enumerating the things that he would not include in his talk. Some months earlier, I had given a colloquium in a physics department where I had a number of friends. My talk was a flop; I carried on about many things that interested me but not them. The following week, for another colloquium at a different university, I used the same title but gave a completely reworked talk, and it was very well received. All of which raised for me the following question: What really makes...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 December 2008
December 01 2008
Who is listening? What do they hear?
In communicating our science, have we put too much emphasis on the information we want to convey? Perhaps there is another way to think about it.
Stephen G. Benka
Stephen G. Benka
Physics Today,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 61 (12), 49–53 (2008);
Citation
Stephen G. Benka; Who is listening? What do they hear?. Physics Today 1 December 2008; 61 (12): 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3047683
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
France’s Oppenheimer
William Sweet
Making qubits from magnetic molecules
Stephen Hill
Learning to see gravitational lenses
Sebastian Fernandez-Mulligan