At the 11 May 1917 meeting of the German Physical Society, Albert Einstein, then a professor at the University of Berlin, presented the only research paper of his career that was written on the quantization of energy for mechanical systems. 1 The paper contained an elegant re-formulation of the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization rules of the old quantum theory, a rethinking that extended and clarified their meaning. Even more impressive, the paper offered a brilliant insight into the limitations of the old quantum theory when applied to a mechanical system that is nonintegrable—or in modern terminology, chaotic. Louis de Broglie cited the paper in his historic thesis on the wave properties of matter, 2 as did Erwin Schrödinger in the second of his seminal papers on the wave equation for quantum mechanics. 3 But the 1917 work was then ignored for more than 25 years until Joseph Keller independently discovered the Einstein...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 August 2005
August 01 2005
Einstein’s Unknown Insight and the Problem of Quantizing Chaos Available to Purchase
Chaotic systems were beyond the reach of an ingenious coordinate-invariant quantization scheme developed by Albert Einstein, and to this day, their quantization remains a challenge.
A. Douglas Stone
A. Douglas Stone
Yale University
, New Haven, Connecticut, US
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Douglas Stone
Yale University
, New Haven, Connecticut, US
Physics Today 58 (8), 37–43 (2005);
Citation
A. Douglas Stone; Einstein’s Unknown Insight and the Problem of Quantizing Chaos. Physics Today 1 August 2005; 58 (8): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2062917
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Seismic data provide a deep dive into groundwater health
Johanna L. Miller
NSF and postwar US science
Emily G. Blevins
On CERN and Russia
Tanja Rindler-Daller