Albert Einstein believed in the possibility of a quantum theory without observers—a version of quan tum theory for which the notions of measurement, observation and observer are not invoked in its very formulation, but rather emerge from an analysis of more fundamental concepts. Niels Bohr believed that such a theory was “in principle” impossible. In part one of this article, I described one approach to such a theory, that of decoherent histories (DH). Although much progress has been made, it could be argued that this approach has not yet yielded a theory that is sufficiently well defined to provide decisive support for Einstein's view. The theories I discuss in this final part of the article are completely well defined and hence provide a conclusive refutation of Bohr's impossibility claims.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 1998
April 01 1998
Quantum Theory without Observers—Part Two
The paradoxes of quantum theory can be resolved in a surprisingly simple way: by insisting that particles always have positions and that they move in a manner naturally suggested by Schrödinger's equation.
Special Collection:
Quantum archive
Sheldon Goldstein
Sheldon Goldstein
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 51 (4), 38–42 (1998);
Citation
Sheldon Goldstein; Quantum Theory without Observers—Part Two. Physics Today 1 April 1998; 51 (4): 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882241
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The lessons learned from ephemeral nuclei
Witold Nazarewicz; Lee G. Sobotka
FYI science policy briefs
Lindsay McKenzie; Jacob Taylor