When I arrived at the General Electric Research Laboratory at the beginning of 1955, fresh from a PhD at Cornell, I was greeted by my supervisor, Leroy Apker, who looked after the semiconductor section of the general physics department. I asked him to suggest some research topics that might be germane to the interests of the section. He said that what I did was entirely up to me. After recovering from my surprise, I asked, “Well, how are you going to judge my performance at the end of the year?” He replied, “Oh, I'll just call up the people at Bell and ask them how they think you are doing.” Viewed from today's environment, what is particularly hard to understand about this conversation is how an industrial laboratory, responsible to the operating units of the company and to the stockholders, could afford to take such a relaxed view.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1995
January 01 1995
Strategic Curiosity: Semiconductor Physics in the 1950s
The distinction between strategic and curiosity‐driven research may be artificial.
Henry Ehrenreich
Henry Ehrenreich
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 48 (1), 28–34 (1995);
Citation
Henry Ehrenreich; Strategic Curiosity: Semiconductor Physics in the 1950s. Physics Today 1 January 1995; 48 (1): 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881450
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
France’s Oppenheimer
William Sweet
Making qubits from magnetic molecules
Stephen Hill
Learning to see gravitational lenses
Sebastian Fernandez-Mulligan