The question of the origin of the blue planet pictured in figure 1 is related to other questions about our beginnings. These include the origin of the universe, the evolution of galaxies and stars, the origin of life and the ascent of humankind. In the late 1700s both Pierre‐Simon Laplace and Immanuel Kant suggested that Earth and the other planets in the solar system had condensed from a flattened nebular disk surrounding the Sun. Since these astute hypotheses were suggested, a series of well‐known physical scientists including James Jeans, Gerald Kuiper and Harold Urey have developed a now widely accepted theory of the accretion of the Earth and planets. Their theory, which I describe below, was based on telescopic observations of the solar system, theoretical calculations and the study of meteorites. Now referred to as the Schmidt theory (after Otto Yu. Schmidt of the Institute of the Earth, Moscow), it explains the formation of the planets as resulting from the accretion of already solid bodies.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1994
August 01 1994
The Origin of the Earth
Data from recent exploration of the solar system and telescopic observations of accretion discs around other stars make a model of Earth's origin more quantitative.
Thomas J. Ahrens
Thomas J. Ahrens
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 47 (8), 38–45 (1994);
Citation
Thomas J. Ahrens; The Origin of the Earth. Physics Today 1 August 1994; 47 (8): 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881436
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
France’s Oppenheimer
William Sweet
Making qubits from magnetic molecules
Stephen Hill
Learning to see gravitational lenses
Sebastian Fernandez-Mulligan