Postmodern movements are well known in the arts. After a major artistic revolution, and after the “modern” innovations have been assimilated, the threads of premodern thought are always reconsidered. Much of value may be rediscovered and put to new use. The modern context casts new light on premodern thought, which in turn shades perspectives on modernism.
REFERENCES
1.
translated by C. Jaffe, report 116, Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, Boulder, Colo., September 1980.
2.
3.
J. Ford, in The New Physics, Paul Davies, ed., Cambridge U.P., New York (1989), p. 348.
4.
H. M. Nussenzveig, Diffraction Effects in Semiclassical Scattering, Cambridge U.P., New York (1992).
5.
6.
7.
G.
Ezra
, K.
Richter
, G.
Tanner
, D.
Wintgen
, J. Phys. B
24
, L413
(1991
).8.
9.
10.
11.
M. V. Berry, in Chaos and Quantum Physics, M. J. Giannoni, A. Voros, J. Zinn‐Justin, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990), p. 251.
12.
13.
J.
Main
, G.
Wiebusch
, A.
Holle
, K. H.
Welge
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
57
, 2789
(1986
).14.
A.
Holle
, G.
Wiebusch
, J.
Main
, B.
Hager
, H.
Rottke
, K. H.
Welge
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
56
, 2594
(1986
).15.
16.
17.
J.
Gao
, J. B.
Delos
, M.
Baruch
, Phys. Rev. A
46
, 1449
(1992
),18.
19.
20.
M. V.
Berry
, N. L.
Balazs
, M.
Tabor
, A.
Voros
, Ann. Phys. (N Y)
122
, 26
(1979
).21.
M.
Sepulveda
, S.
Tomsovic
, E. J.
Heller
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
69
, 402
(1992
).22.
C. M.
Marcus
, A. J.
Rimberg
, R. M.
Westervelt
, P. F.
Hopkins
, A. C.
Gossard
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
69
, 506
(1992
).23.
24.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1993 American Institute of Physics.
1993
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
