On 15 March 1989 the principle of confidentiality in peer review received a strong legal foundation, in the form of a unanimous decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Important principles frequently get established with little trumpeting and under innocuous rubrics: Roe v. Wade, Brown v. Board of Education. This decision goes by the name of Solarex Corporation and RCA Corporation v. Arco Solar Inc v. The American Physical Society, Fed. Cir. No. 88‐1542. The consequences of the judgment on the side issue between Arco Solar and APS that arose from this suit should go far beyond the immediate case, into the realm of protection of the confidentiality of all the thousands of referees who have reviewed and will review papers for the journals of The American Physical Society and for other scholarly journals.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1989
October 01 1989
In Defense of Confidentiality
As lawyers from two factions exchanged arguments, the protective anonymity surrounding reviewers of scientific manuscripts hung in the balance.
David Lazarus
David Lazarus
American Physical Society
Search for other works by this author on:
David Lazarus
American Physical Society
Physics Today 42 (10), 57–59 (1989);
Citation
David Lazarus; In Defense of Confidentiality. Physics Today 1 October 1989; 42 (10): 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881206
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The no-cloning theorem
William K. Wootters; Wojciech H. Zurek
Dense crowds follow their own rules
Johanna L. Miller
Focus on software, data acquisition, and instrumentation
Andreas Mandelis