In April, The American Physical Society issued a 424‐page report saying that “even in the best of circumstances, a decade or more of intensive research would be required to provide the technical knowledge needed for an informed decision about the potential effectiveness and survivability of directed‐energy weapon systems.” (See PHYSICS TODAY, May 1987, page S1.) In May, Los Alamos National Laboratory published a 70‐page paper by Gregory Canavan that is optimistic about a directed‐energy weapons system and critical of the APS study. (See PHYSICS TODAY, June, page 43.) In this debate Canavan criticizes the APS study on ten technical issues, and Nicolaas Bloembergen and Kumar Patel, the cochairmen of the APS study group, respond point by point.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1987
November 01 1987
Debate on APS Directed‐Energy Weapons Study
Is it unduly pessimistic to conclude that it would take a decade or more of intensive research just to determine the feasibility of shielding the US with a system of high‐intensity laser and energetic particle beam weapons?
Gregory H. Canavan;
Gregory H. Canavan
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Search for other works by this author on:
Nicolaas Bloembergen;
Nicolaas Bloembergen
Harvard University
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Kumar N. Patel
C. Kumar N. Patel
AT&T Dell Laboratories
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 40 (11), 48–53 (1987);
Citation
Gregory H. Canavan, Nicolaas Bloembergen, C. Kumar N. Patel; Debate on APS Directed‐Energy Weapons Study. Physics Today 1 November 1987; 40 (11): 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881090
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionPERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.