The past century has seen major advances in diffraction gratings, motivated by pressure for new and better data in two rather distinct fields: laboratory spectroscopy—aimed at understanding atomic structure and testing quantum theory—and astrophysical spectroscopy—aimed at understanding objects ranging from the Sun and stars to faint sources at the limit of detection. In this historical account I trace some of the hard‐won gains in the technology of the ruling machines that produce the gratings, and I touch on the role that larger and higher‐quality gratings have played in scientific advances. I focus on the work at the Mount Wilson Observatory, where I directed the diffraction‐grating laboratory from 1948 to 1963, but I do so with full recognition of the important contributions made at numerous other laboratories, especially those at The Johns Hopkins University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Bausch & Lomb Optical Company.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 1986
July 01 1986
Diffraction Gratings at the Mount Wilson Observatory Available to Purchase
‘Engines’ capable of ruling hundreds of thousands of straight, parallel, equally spaced grooves within tolerances of only a few angstroms have led to advances in fields as different as quantum mechanics and astrophysics.
Horace W. Babcock
Horace W. Babcock
Mount Wilson and Palomar Observatories, Pasadena, California
Search for other works by this author on:
Horace W. Babcock
Mount Wilson and Palomar Observatories, Pasadena, California
Physics Today 39 (7), 34–42 (1986);
Citation
Horace W. Babcock; Diffraction Gratings at the Mount Wilson Observatory. Physics Today 1 July 1986; 39 (7): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881035
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
FYI science policy briefs
Lindsay McKenzie; Hannah Daniel
Another Fowler
Peter J. Turchi
Wu, Shaknov, and the EPR dilemma
Peter W. Milonni