We have witnessed over the last year or so an enormous growth in the political impact, if not the technical impact, of the President's Strategic Defense Initiative, popularly called “Star Wars.” Some argue that without this initiative the Soviets would not have “returned to the bargaining table” to resume talks on strategic and intermediaterange weapons. Others argue that with SDI the United States cannot possibly reach an arms‐control agreement with the Soviet Union. The true believers assert that SDI points the way to a future free of nuclear weapons, while opponents claim that it is a sure‐fire prescription for a major escalation in the arms race, the militarization of space and a collapse of the current, albeit limited, arms‐control regime. (See Gerold Yonas's article on page 24.)
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 1985
June 01 1985
The Strategic Defense Initiative: Perception vs Reality
ABM defense technology deserves further research within treaty limits, but the “Star Wars” program is too large, too political, raises false hopes and poses grave dangers to national and world security.
Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky
Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Search for other works by this author on:
Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Physics Today 38 (6), 34–45 (1985);
Citation
Wolfgang K. H. Panofsky; The Strategic Defense Initiative: Perception vs Reality. Physics Today 1 June 1985; 38 (6): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.880977
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The no-cloning theorem
William K. Wootters; Wojciech H. Zurek
Dense crowds follow their own rules
Johanna L. Miller
Focus on software, data acquisition, and instrumentation
Andreas Mandelis