On 18 January 1672 Isaac Newton wrote Henry Oldenburg, Secretary of the Royal Society, that he would send him a paper that he modestly described as “being in my Judgment the oddest if not the most considerable detection wch hath hitherto beene made in the operations of Nature.” Newton was not referring to his theory of gravitation—that was still more than a dozen years away—but rather to his new theory of the nature of white light and color. He had discovered that rays of different color have different degrees of refrangibility—or, as we would put it, that the index of refraction varies with wavelength—and that white light and, in particular, sunlight consist of a mixture of innumerable colors. Less than three weeks later, as Newton promised, he sent to the Royal Society his famous paper, “A New theory about light and colors,” which was published at once in the Philosophical Transactions. In the “New theory” he boldly proclaims: “A naturalist would scearce expect to see ye science of [colours] become mathematicall, & yet I dare affirm that there is as much certainty in it as in any other part of Opticks. For what I shall tell concerning them is not an Hypothesis but most rigid consequence, not conjectured by barely inferring ‘tis thus because not otherwise or because it satisfies all phaenomena (the Philosophers universall Topick), but evinced by ye mediation of experiments concluding directly & wthout any suspicion of doubt.”

1.
H. W. Turnbull, ed., The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge (1959), volume 1, page 82.
2.
Reference 1, page 96. Oldenburg deleted this passage in the paper published in Phil. Trans.
3.
A. E. Shapiro, ed., The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton, Cambridge University Press (1984), volume 1, page 439.
4.
See
A. E.
Shapiro
,
Isis
71
,
211
(
1980
).
5.
See
Z.
Bechler
,
Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.
11
,
1
(
1973
).
6.
Reference 3, page 201.
7.
Reference 3, page 542.
8.
See
Z.
Bechler
,
Brit. J. Hist. Sci.
8
,
101
(
1975
);
A. E.
Shapiro
,
Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.
21
,
91
(
1979
).
9.
Reference 1, page 187. This passage too was deleted by Oldenburg in the reply published in Phil. Trans.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.