Might the fiery explosions from a massive nuclear war cast a cold and dark shadow over vast regions of the Earth? That gloomy possibility has been predicted by atmospheric chemists and physicists who have recently tried to quantify the environmental effects of the soot, dust and other emissions from a hypothetical nuclear exchange. The litany of known major effects from nuclear weapons—blast, fire, fallout and possibly stratospheric ozone depletion—always seemed horrible enough. Last year, Paul J. Crutzen (Max Planck Institute for Chemistry) and John W. Birks (University of Colorado) suggested that another effect might be severe enough to go on that list: the black curtain of smoke from fires initiated in a large‐scale nuclear attack. (See PHYSICS TODAY, October 1982, page 17.) The new work now indicates that the phenomenon might be severe enough to lower temperatures over large regions of Earth below the freezing mark, even in summer, for perhaps months after a massive nuclear exchange. Richard Turco (R&D Associates), who participated in the study, has coined the phrase “nuclear winter” to describe the phenomenon.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 1984
February 01 1984
Atmospheric calculations suggest a nuclear winter
Physics Today 37 (2), 17–20 (1984);
Citation
Barbara G. Levi; Atmospheric calculations suggest a nuclear winter. Physics Today 1 February 1984; 37 (2): 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2916077
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Going with the flow in unstable surroundings
Savannah D. Gowen; Thomas E. Videbæk; Sidney R. Nagel
Measuring violin resonances
Elizabeth M. Wood
Focus on cryogenics, vacuum equipment, materials, and semiconductors
Andreas Mandelis