Science and mathematics education in this country is in a precarious state. Most of our students do not learn nearly as much as they could and many of our teachers are ill prepared. That the state of affairs has deteriorated to the point of becoming a crisis is confirmed by the number of editorials in our journals, the amount of legislation being proposed at all levels, the attention given the subject in the popular press and the number of meetings held to discuss the crisis. Thus, for example, the National Academy of Sciences sponsored a national convocation (May 1982) to consider the state of precollege education in the United States. The topic also received special attention in October 1982 at The American Institute of Physics Corporate Associates meeting and at the Spring 1983 meeting of the AIP Assembly of Society Officers and the AIP Governing Board meeting.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 1983
September 01 1983
Overview of the problem
Our present situation is the culmination of a long trend—interrupted only weakly in the Sputnik era—of declining enrollments in physics, but the state of the economy may provide a new context.
John W. Layman
John W. Layman
University of Maryland
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 36 (9), 26–30 (1983);
Citation
John W. Layman; Overview of the problem. Physics Today 1 September 1983; 36 (9): 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2915845
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The lessons learned from ephemeral nuclei
Witold Nazarewicz; Lee G. Sobotka
FYI science policy briefs
Lindsay McKenzie; Jacob Taylor