In this article I present a somewhat detailed discussion of four examples of nuclear waste policy issues, in the hope that this may better convey an idea of the complexity of the entire topic. The first will show how drastically our perception of the waste‐disposal issue has changed in recent years, and should thus teach us some caution with regard to our present understanding. The second is geotechnical: It concerns site for high‐level nuclear waste and demonstrates some of its problems. The third concerns uranium mill tailings and will show the environmental risks posed by the very large volumes of low‐level radioactive wastes. The last example will address the least predictable aspect of long‐term management of nuclear wastes: future human activities, and how they affect the proper planning of nuclear waste disposal.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 1982
December 01 1982
Debate on radioactive waste disposal. Will it stay put?
Do we know enough to dispose safely of waste that will remain radioactive for tens of thousands of years, or will any disposal program inevitably end up as an albatross around the neck of future generations?
Robert O. Pohl
Robert O. Pohl
Cornell University
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 35 (12), 37–45 (1982);
Citation
Robert O. Pohl; Debate on radioactive waste disposal. Will it stay put?. Physics Today 1 December 1982; 35 (12): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2914882
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
17
Views
Citing articles via
The lessons learned from ephemeral nuclei
Witold Nazarewicz; Lee G. Sobotka
FYI science policy briefs
Lindsay McKenzie; Jacob Taylor