Civil defense, once a hotly debated issue of the 1960's, has again surfaced as a topic of controversy. It reappears amid the discussions of possible new strategies being proposed by the Defense Department. In January 1974, the then Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger announced the intention of the US to develop long‐range ballistic missiles of unprecedented accuracy. Because such weapons would have a relatively small error radius their yield would not have to be as large to be effective against military targets such as land‐based offensive missiles. Hence the Defense Department has raised the possibility of a limited nuclear war with counterforce strikes (that is, against the opponent's offensive force) coupled with a program of civil defense to ensure a minimal level of civilian casualties.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
Article navigation
April 1976
April 01 1976
Civil defense in limited war—a debate Available to Purchase
Have recent developments in strategic weapons given us reason to look at civil defense in a new context?
Arthur A. Broyles;
Arthur A. Broyles
University of Florida, Gainesville
Search for other works by this author on:
Sidney D. Drell
Sidney D. Drell
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Search for other works by this author on:
Arthur A. Broyles
Eugene P. Wigner
Sidney D. Drell
University of Florida, Gainesville
Physics Today 29 (4), 44–57 (1976);
Citation
Arthur A. Broyles, Eugene P. Wigner, Sidney D. Drell; Civil defense in limited war—a debate. Physics Today 1 April 1976; 29 (4): 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3023423
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Seismic data provide a deep dive into groundwater health
Johanna L. Miller
NSF and postwar US science
Emily G. Blevins
On CERN and Russia
Tanja Rindler-Daller