WHO ARE “NONSCIENCE STUDENTS” and what shall we teach them? These appear to be reasonable questions. The Commission on College Physics has asked these questions in various ways during its ten years of existence and has some products and by‐products of the asking. The vagueness of the first part of the question has made the last part difficult to answer; it is not easy to decide what to teach students when you only know who they are not. In the instruction of our physics majors we can afford to rely heavily on intuition. These students are exposed to physics and physicists for a long enough period to learn from the left hand the subtle processes of physics along with the content that we teach with the right. But we do not have time for this approach to our nonscience students. We must do the choreography for the left as well as the right hand.
Skip Nav Destination
,
Article navigation
March 1970
March 01 1970
What our left hand has been doing Available to Purchase
Although set up to develop effective ways of teaching future physicists, CCP is concerning itself more and more with the nonscience students.
John M. Fowler;
John M. Fowler
Commission on College Physics and University of Maryland
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard West
Richard West
Commission on College Physics and University of Maryland
Search for other works by this author on:
John M. Fowler
Richard West
Commission on College Physics and University of Maryland
Physics Today 23 (3), 24–32 (1970);
Citation
John M. Fowler, Richard West; What our left hand has been doing. Physics Today 1 March 1970; 23 (3): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3022016
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Seismic data provide a deep dive into groundwater health
Johanna L. Miller
NSF and postwar US science
Emily G. Blevins
On CERN and Russia
Tanja Rindler-Daller