THE PHENOMENAL IMPACT of the modern digital computer on our society has not bypassed physics instruction. As early as the late 1950's and early 1960's research was going on at the Universities of Michigan and Illinois on computers in science and engineering education. Development of the field was stimulated by two conferences in 1965 at the University of California, Irvine, and the University of Washington. The reports on these conferences are basic references for anyone wishing to look further into the subject. The number and variety of current projects in the field is increasing rapidly, as indicated by the sections devoted to the subject at annual meetings of the American Association of Physics Teachers.

1.
Instruction by Design: A Report on the Conference on New Instructional Materials in Physics Held at the University of Washington, Summer 1965, Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md.
2.
The Computer in Physics Instruction: Report of the Conference on the Uses of the Computer in Undergraduate Physics Instruction Held November 4–6, 1965 at the University of California, Irvine, Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md.
3.
A. M.
Bork
, “
Least Action via Computer
,”
Am. J. Phys.
37
,
386
(
1969
).
4.
J.
Weizenbaum
, “
Contextual Understanding by Computers
,”
Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery
10
,
474
(
1967
).
5.
E. F.
Taylor
, “
Automated Tutoring and its Discontents
,”
Am. J. Phys.
36
,
496
(
1968
).
6.
Short Films for Physics Teaching: A Catalog, Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md. (1967).
7.
A.
Goldberg
,
H. M.
Schey
,
J. L.
Schwartz
, “
Computer‐Generated Motion Pictures of One‐Dimensional Quantum‐Mechanical Transmission and Reflection Phenomena
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
177
(
1967
).
8.
J. L.
Schwartz
,
E. F.
Taylor
, “
Computer Displays in the Teaching of Physics
,”
American Federation of Information Processing Societies Conference Proceedings
33
,
1285
(
1968
).
9.
W. Stenberg et al., Calculus: A Computer Oriented Presentation, Center for Research in College Instruction of Science and Mathematics, Tallahas‐see, Fla. (preliminary edition, 1968).
10.
“Computer Classroom,” Intermediate Science Curriculum Study Newsletter, no. 3, October 1967, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Fla.
11.
A. M.
Bork
, “
Computers in High School Physics
,”
The Physics Teacher
6
,
296
(
1968
).
12.
C. H.
Frye
, “
CAI Languages: Capabilities and Applications
,”
Datamation
14
, no.
9
,
34
(
1968
).
13.
The Dartmouth Time‐Sharing Computing System, Final Report, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N. H. (1967).
14.
A.
Luehrmann
, “
The Square Well in Quantum Mechanics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
275
(
1967
).
15.
A. M. Bork, A. Luehrmann, J. W. Robson, Introductory Computer‐Based Mechanics: A One Week Sample Course (R. Blum, ed.), Commission on College Physics, College Park, Md. (1968).
16.
O. M.
Kromhout
,
S.
Edwards
,
G.
Schwarz
, “
A Computer Guided General Education Physics Course
,”
Am. J. Phys.
37
, (Oct.,
1969
) (in press).
17.
A. M.
Bork
, “
Computers and the Nonscience Major
,”
Am. J. Phys.
34
,
926
(
1966
).
18.
J. H.
Kanner
, “
CAI—The New Demonology?
Datamation
14
, no.
9
,
38
(
1968
).
19.
K. L.
Zinn
, “
Instructional Uses of Interactive Computer Systems
,”
Datamation
14
, no.
9
,
22
(
1968
).
20.
P. H.
Abelson
, “
Computer‐Assisted Instruction
,”
Science
162
,
855
(
1968
).
21.
A. M.
Bork
, “
A Physics Independent Study Course with Computer
,”
Am. J. Phys.
31
,
364
(
1963
).
22.
Op. cit. ref. 2, p. 52.
23.
A. M. Bork, Notions about Motion (Mimeographed text, University of California, Irvine, 1968).
24.
D. N. Hansen, W. Dick, H. T. Lippert, Semiannual Progress Report, July 1, 1967, through Dec. 31, 1967, (Florida State University Computer Assisted Instruction Center Report no. 6, Tallahassee, Fla., 1968).
25.
D. N. Hansen, W. Dick, H. T. Lippert, Semiannual Progress Report, Jan. 1, 1967 through June 20, 1967. (Florida State University Computer Assisted Instruction Center Report no. 5, Tallahassee,, Fla., 1967).
26.
E. R. Lyman, A Descriptive List of Plato Programs, 1960 to 1968, Computer‐Based Education Research Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
27.
A.
Goldberg
,
H. M.
Schey
,
J. L.
Schwartz
, “
Edge Effects in One‐Dimensional Scattering
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
777
(
1967
).
28.
D. T.
Axelrod
,
J. L.
Schwartz
, “
Scattering of Charged Particles From a Variety of Charge Distributions
,”
Am. J. Phys.
35
,
1162
(
1967
).
29.
A.
Goldberg
,
H. M.
Schey
,
J. L.
Schwartz
, “
One‐Dimensional Scattering in Configuration Space and Momentum Space
,”
Am. J. Phys.
36
,
454
(
1968
).
30.
W. E.
Daniels
,
J. L.
Schwartz
, “
A Quantum‐Mechanical Ripple Tank
,”
Am. J. Phys.
36
,
1088
(
1968
).
31.
R. C. Rosenberg, Computer‐Aided Teaching of Dynamic System Behavior (Technical Report ESD‐TR‐260, Electronic Systems Division, USAF Systems Command, Bedford, Mass., 1965) (copies available from author).
32.
A. M. Bork, “Using Computers in Teaching Elementary Physics,” in Northeast Electronic Research and Engineering Meeting Record (1967).
33.
A. M.
Bork
, “
Computers and The Feynman Lectures on Physics
,”
Am. J. Phys.
32
,
173
(
1964
).
34.
A. M. Bork, FORTRAN for Physics, Addison—Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, Mass. (1967).
35.
A. M. Bork, Using the IBM—1130, Addison—Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, Mass. (1968).
36.
A. M. Bork, Physics and the Computer—An Introduction to Classical Mechanics andJOSS, (Preliminary version, unpublished) (1967).
37.
A. M.
Bork
, “
Instructional Uses of the Computer: 1130 FORTRAN Mechanics Program
,”
Am. J. Phys.
36
,
907
(
1968
).
38.
A. F. Vierling, J. L. Jones, Physics Problem Workbook, (A subproject under Naval Bureau of Personnel). (US Naval Academy technical report no. TDP43‐03X).
39.
A. F. Vierling, J. S. Vierling, Computer Assisted Learning, Hafner Publishing Co, New York (1968).
40.
R. W. Brehme, TheELIZASystem at Wake Forest University: ELIZA: A Skimmahle Report on theELIZAConversational Tutoring System, MIT Education Research Center, Cambridge, Mass. (1968).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.