DETERMINATION OF THE fundamental law of force between two nucleons has occupied many physicists for the past three decades. Because the proton and electron have obvious similarities (elementarily, spin of 1/2, equal‐but opposite electric charge, Fermi statistics, antiparticles) the derivation of a nuclear “Coulomb's law” would seem to be a just reward for working in this area. As we have rather slowly and laboriously learned, however, simplicity appears to be inversely proportional to some power of the coupling constant.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
J. M. B.
Kellogg
, I. I.
Rabi
, N. F.
Ramsey
,Jr , J. R.
Zacharias
, Phys. Rev.
55
, 318
(1939
);J. M. B.
Kellogg
, I. I.
Rabi
, N. F.
Ramsey
, Jr, J. R.
Zacharias
, 56
, 728
(1939
)., Phys. Rev.
9.
10.
11.
R. E.
Seamon
, K. A.
Friedman
, G.
Breit
, R. D.
Haracz
, J. M.
Holt
, A.
Prakash
, Phys. Rev.
165
, 1579
(1968
).12.
L.
Puzikov
, R.
Ryndin
, J.
Smorodinskij
, Nuclear Physics
3
, 436
(1957
).13.
M. H.
Mac Gregor
, R. A.
Arndt
, A. A.
Dubow
, Phys. Rev.
135
, B628
(1964
).14.
M.
Hull
, K.
Lassila
, H.
Ruppel
, F.
McDonald
, G.
Breit
, Phys. Rev.
122
, 1606
(1961
);15.
16.
R. J. N. Phillips, Nucleon–Nucleon Scattering Experiments, Harwell report AERE‐R3141 (1960).
17.
H. P.
Stapp
, T.
Ypsilantis
, N.
Metropolis
, Phys. Rev.
105
, 302
(1957
).18.
19.
R. A. Arndt, M. H. Mac Gregor, Methods in Computational Physics, vol. 6, Academic Press (1966).
20.
P.
Signell
, N. R.
Yoder
, N. M.
Miskovsky
, Phys. Rev.
133
, B1495
(1964
).21.
22.
23.
O.
Chamberlain
, E.
Segrè
, R. D.
Tripp
, C.
Wiegand
, T.
Ypsilantis
, Phys. Rev.
105
, 288
(1957
).24.
Prog. Theoret. Phys., Supplement 3, (Kyoto) (1956).
25.
P.
Cziffra
, M. H.
Mac Gregor
, M. J.
Moravcsik
, H. P.
Stapp
, Phys. Rev.
114
, 880
(1959
).26.
27.
28.
Reported at the London “Few Nucleon Conference,” 1959.
29.
H. P. Stapp, H. P. Noyes, M. J. Moravcsik, Proceedings of the 1960 High Energy Conferences at Rochester, p. 128;
Proceedings of the 1962 High Energy Conferences at CERN, p. 131.
30.
M. H.
Mac Gregor
, R. A.
Arndt
, R. M.
Wright
, Phys. Rev.
182
, 1714
(1969
).31.
M. H.
Mac Gregor
, R. A.
Arndt
, R. M.
Wright
, Phys. Rev.
182
, 1714
(1969
).32.
33.
34.
G. Breit, R. D. Haracz, High Energy Physics, (E. H. S. Burhop, ed.) vol. 1, p. 21, Academic Press Inc., New York, (1967).
35.
L. N. Rothenberg, T. G. Masterson, Angular Distribution of 24‐MeV Neutrons Scattered by Protons, Univ. of Wisc. abstract for APS Washington meeting, April (1969).
36.
S. C.
Wright
, D.
Shawhan
, L.
Pondrom
, S.
Olsen
, R.
Handler
, Phys. Rev.
175
, 1704
(1968
).37.
M. H.
Mac Gregor
, R. M.
Wright
, R. A.
Arndt
, Phys. Rev. Lett.
19
, 1209
(1967
);M. H.
Mac Gregor
, R. A.
Arndt
, R. M.
Wright
, Phys. Rev.
179
, 1624
(1969
).38.
J.
Bystricky
, J.
Čech
, Z.
Janout
, Yu. M.
Kazarinov
, F.
Lehar
, L. B.
Parfenov
, Phys. Lett.
28B
, 572
(1969
).39.
Proceedings of the 1st International Colloquium on Nucleon–Nucleon and Pion–Nucleon Interactions, Dubna, lune (1968) (in Russian).
40.
S. I. Bilenkaya, G. Cozzika, F. Lehar, Z. Janout, Phase‐Shift Analysis of p‐p and n‐p Elastic Scattering at 735 MeV, CERN preprint, June 1969.
41.
N.
Hoshizaki
, S.
Otsuki
, W.
Watari
, M.
Yonezawa
, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto)
27
, 1199
(1962
);42.
R. A.
Arndt
, R. A.
Bryan
, M. H.
Mac Gregor
, Phys. Lett.
21
, 314
(1966
).43.
S. Stone III, Univ. of Calif. at Berkeley thesis, A Eorm‐Free, Semiphenomenological, Error‐Bounded, Potential Representation of Two‐Nucleon Experiments, July 1969.
44.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1969 American Institute of Physics.
1969
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.
