LIKE THE PROGRAMS of the United Nations, interdisciplinary courses offer obvious advantages in theory but in practice often founder on political realities. Sometimes they also work well. Following the analogy, the interdisciplinary idea appears to work most successfully when applied outside the sphere of influence of the science department, that is, in courses for the “nonscientist.” But the situation is more difficult with joint introductory courses for science majors; for these courses are besieged with the possessive instincts of science departments toward their majors and with the narrow curricular views of the separate disciplines. Not surprisingly, perhaps, physics departments have, in many instances, stood out as the “hard line” department. Their rigorous view of what students should learn has left course developers with a disciplinary lump in the interdisciplinary amalgam.

Topics
Alloys, Education
1.
“Teaching Physics and Chemistry in a Combined Course,” Report of the Beloit Conference, 27–30 December 1961, Beloit College, Beloit, Wisconsin.
2.
“Joint Conference on Multidisciplinary Courses in Science,” Cosponsored by the Commission on College Physics and the Advisory Council on College Chemistry, 3–4 February 1967, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
3.
E.
Fuller
,
J. Chem. Educ.
44
,
542
(
1967
).
Google Scholar
Crossref
Search ADS
PubMed
 
4.
“Conference on Interdisciplinary Curricula in the National Sciences in the Liberal Arts College,” 20–21 October 1967, Hope College, Holland, Michigan.
5.
AIP Educational Newsletter ♯7 (15 September 1967).
6.
E.
Wood
,
Am. J. Phys.
34
, part
II
,
891
(
1966
).
Google Scholar
 
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1968 American Institute of Physics.
1968
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.