As science grows, its demands on our society's resources grow. It seems inevitable that science's demands will eventually be limited by what society can allocate to it. We shall then have to make choices. These choices are of two kinds. We shall have to choose among different, often incommensurable, fields of science—between, for example, high‐energy physics and oceanography or between molecular biology and science of metals. We shall also have to choose among the different institutions that receive support for science from the government—among universities, governmental laboratories, and industry. The first choice I call scientific choice; the second, institutional choice. My purpose is to suggest criteria for making scientific choices—to formulate a scale of values which might help establish priorities among scientific fields whose only common characteristic is that they all derive support from the government.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1964
March 01 1964
Criteria for scientific choice Available to Purchase
Alvin M. Weinberg
Alvin M. Weinberg
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Search for other works by this author on:
Alvin M. Weinberg
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Physics Today 17 (3), 42–48 (1964);
Citation
Alvin M. Weinberg; Criteria for scientific choice. Physics Today 1 March 1964; 17 (3): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3051468
Download citation file:
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Q&A: Tam O’Shaughnessy honors Sally Ride’s courage and character
Jenessa Duncombe
Ballooning in Albuquerque: What’s so special?
Michael Anand
Comments on early space controversies
W. David Cummings; Louis J. Lanzerotti