Argument over the degree of centralization of technical library facilities in universities, industrial organizations, or governmental institutions is widespread. The lines of difference are fairly clear. Library administrators claim that centralization is required for economical, efficient acquisition and management of the huge numbers of publications involved in an up‐to‐date, well‐stocked library. Users, on the other hand, argue that they cannot read and study effectively and efficiently unless frequently used documents are within easy reach.

Topics
Libraries
1.
D. A. Wells, Individual Departmental Libraries vs. Consolidated Science Libraries, Physics Today, May 1961.
2.
R. B. Downs, Crises in Our University Libraries, College and Research Libraries, January 1961.
3.
Unpublished Communication, National Science Foundation, March 1961.
4.
E. Brodman and S. I. Taine, Current Medical Literature: A Quantitative Survey of Articles and Journals, Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council, 1959, Page 435.
5.
R. H. Phelps and John P. Herling, Alternatives to the Scientific Periodical, UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries, March–April 1960.
6.
A Guide to U.S. Indexing and Abstracting Science in Science and Technology, National Federation of Science Abstracting and Indexing Services, Report No. 101, June 1960.
7.
M. A. Doss, The Importance of Peripheral Publications in the Documentation of Biology, Ibid. Page 429.
8.
John P. Herling, Engineering Abstracting Services, Special Libraries, December 1961.
9.
N. Rigby and M. K. Rigby, Cost Analysis of Bibliographies or Bibliographic Services, Ibid. Page 381.
10.
LaVahn Overmyer, Test Program for Evaluating Procedures for the Exploration of Literature of Interest to Metallurgists, Center for Documentation and Communication Research, Western Reserve University.
11.
V. W. Clapp, Information Storage and Retrieval and the Problems of Libraries, America Documentation, July 1961.
12.
A Study of the Dissemination and Use of Recorded Scientific Information, Operations Research Group, Case Institute of Technology, December 1960.
13.
The flow of Information among Scientists, Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research, May 1958.
14.
S. Herner, The Information‐Gathering Habits of American Medical Scientists, Ibid. Page 277.
15.
C. Scott, Use of Literature by Industrial Technologists, Ibid. Page 245.
16.
G. H. Davison, Microtext, The United steel Companies Limited, Rotherham, England.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1963 American Institute of Physics.
1963
American Institute of Physics
You do not currently have access to this content.