Our Committee was set up in order to suggest how the physics curricula in schools could be revised. The nature of any revision is obviously determined largely by the ultimate purpose that physics teaching in schools is considered to have. Our own discussions have been based upon our strong belief that physics, the most exact and fundamental of the sciences, is a vital part of modern culture and, as such, a necessary element in the education of all children. There are some who appear to equate science with technology and who advocate the extended or more intensive teaching of science because of its probable contribution to increased material well‐being. We are well aware of the economic aspects of technological development and of their importance; nevertheless, the cultural value of science—which is all too often inadequately appreciated—should be the aspect which determines the extent and the nature of the science courses in schools. Modern science has changed not only man's environment but his whole approach to many of the problems which he has to face—and which his predecessors had to face. Science is not only a powerful weapon with which to attack material problems; it provides a new process of thought, and new criteria of credibility and of acceptability of evidence. Philosophy, theology, politics, and economics have all been influenced in differing degrees by science, and the most powerful influences have been the result of the changing picture of natural phenomena that scientific thought has created. In the present context, it cannot be too strongly emphasized that science is one of the humanities. Physics is not a collection of “facts” which can be learned; it is a highly imaginative intellectual structure of concepts that gives a meaningful and creative picture or model of such of man's experience of the world in which he lives as it has yet been possible to integrate into a consistent whole. It is a picture that is constantly being given further detail and some parts of which are occasionally being redrawn. The reasons why physics has a place in a child's education are firstly that the story of the drawing of that picture is a remarkable tribute to the power of the human mind and, secondly, the model of nature that physics provides is a necessary component of any fruitful modem thinking about some of the most important of the perennial problems that man has to attempt to solve as a social being.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1961
January 01 1961
The teaching of physics in schools
The following report, prepared for the Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation, was presented at the International Conference on Physics Education, which was held last summer in Paris and is described in the preceding article by J. W. Buchta. As part of its program, this Office of the OEEC is conducting several studies of secondary‐school science education with the aim of bringing the science curricula into line with modern developments in the scientific disciplines. The present document, which is an abbreviated version of a report produced as part of the preparatory work now being undertaken in physics, was prepared by a working group having the following members: Norman Clarke (Great Britain), A. Michels (Holland), M. A. Renaud (Switzerland), D. Sette (Italy), S. Sikjaer (Denmark), J. Topping (Great Britain), and L. Weil (France). The original report was carried over the signature of Dr. Clarke in his role as chairman of the group.
Norman Clark;
Norman Clark
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Michels;
A. Michels
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
M. A. Renaud;
M. A. Renaud
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Sette;
D. Sette
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
S. Sikjaer;
S. Sikjaer
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Topping;
J. Topping
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
L. Weil
L. Weil
Office for Scientific and Technical Personnel of the Organization for European Economic Cooperation
Search for other works by this author on:
Physics Today 14 (1), 30–38 (1961);
Citation
Norman Clark, A. Michels, M. A. Renaud, D. Sette, S. Sikjaer, J. Topping, L. Weil; The teaching of physics in schools. Physics Today 1 January 1961; 14 (1): 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3057330
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
PERSONAL SUBSCRIPTION
Purchase an annual subscription for $25. A subscription grants you access to all of Physics Today's current and backfile content.
Citing articles via
Corals face historic bleaching
Alex Lopatka
Grete Hermann’s ethical philosophy of physics
Andrea Reichenberger
Focus on lasers, imaging, microscopy, and photonics
Andreas Mandelis