According to current ANSI Z136.1, IEC 60825-1 and ICNIRP guidelines, two exposure limit criteria apply for the cornea and skin: the single pulse limit and the average irradiance limit. The reduction factor CP for repetitively pulsed exposures need only be applied to retinal thermal limits, not to limits to protect the skin and cornea from thermally induced injury. Since only a very limited amount of animal studies for multiple-pulse thresholds are available for the cornea and skin, we have used a computer model to systematically study the threshold trends for exposure to multiple pulses. For a number of representative wavelengths and irradiance diameters, and two pulse durations, injury thresholds as predicted by computer models were compared to the two exposure limit criteria as a function of duty cycle (i.e. repetition rate), number of pulses and as a function of exposure duration. The results support the current multiple-pulse criteria for the cornea and the skin, i.e. no additional reduction of the single pulse limit by CP: for those repetition rates where the single pulse limit is the limiting criterion, the reduction of injury threshold compared to the single pulse is weak. For higher repetition rates, when the average irradiance limit is the limiting criterion the worst case is a cw exposure (duty cycle 100%) and reducing the duty cycle, i.e. pulsed exposure, leads to increased (less critical) thresholds.

1.
International Electrotechnical Commission
(
2014
)
IEC 60825-1 Ed. 3.0: Safety of laser products – Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
.
2.
ANSI Z136.1 Safe Use of Lasers
(
2014
)
Laser Institute of America
.
3.
ICNIRP
(
2013
)
ICNIRP Guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 1000 µm
,
Health Physics
105
(
3
).
4.
Schulmeister
,
K.
,
Jean
,
M.
,
Lund
,
D.J.
&
Stuck
,
B.E.
(
2019
)
Comparison of laser induced corneal injury thresholds with safety limits, in
Proceedings of ILSC 2019, paper #303
.
5.
Schulmeister
,
K.
,
Jean
,
M.
,
Lund
,
D.J.
&
Stuck
,
B.E.
(
2019
)
Comparison of laser induced corneal injury thresholds with safety limits
, submitted to J. Laser Appl.
6.
Schulmeister
,
K.
&
Jean
,
M.
(
2011
)
Modelling of laser induced injury of the cornea
, in
Proceedings of ILSC 2011, paper #903
.
7.
Jean
,
M.
,
Schulmeister
,
K.
,
Lund
,
D.J.
&
Stuck
,
B.E.
(
2019
)
Laser induced corneal injury: validation of a computer model to predict thresholds
, submitted to J. Biomed Opt.
8.
Jean
,
M.
,
Schulmeister
,
K.
&
Stuck
,
B.E.
(
2013
)
Computer modeling of laser induced injury of the skin
, in
Proceedings of ILSC 2013, paper #105
.
9.
Farrell
,
R.A.
,
McCally
,
R.L.
Bargeron
,
C.B.
&
Green
,
W.R.
(
1985
) Structural alterations in the cornea from exposure to infrared radiation,
Tech Mem JHU/APL TG 1364
,
US Army Medical, Frederick
,
Maryland, USA
.
10.
McCally
,
R.L.
(
1997
)
Corneal damage from infrared radiation, Annual Report
,
US Army Medical
,
Frederick, Maryland, USA
.
11.
McCally
,
R.L.
&
Bargeron
,
C.B.
(
2003
)
Corneal epithelial injury thresholds for multiple-pulse exposures to Tm:YAG laser radiation at 2.02 µm
,
Health Physics
Vol.
85 p
420
427
.
12.
McCally
,
R.L.
,
Bonney-Ray
J
(
2005
)
Corneal epithelial injury thresholds for multiple-pulse exposures to erbium fiber laser radiation at 1.54 µm, in
Proceedings of SPIE 5688
.
13.
Lukashev
,
A. V.
,
Sverchkov
,
S.E.
,
Solovyev
,
V.P.
 et al (
1995
)
Investigation of laser damage on skin by 1540 nm Er-glass laser, Tech Report
,
General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
,
Moscow, Russia
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.