Although the use of an access control interlock system is widely recognized as the best method of protecting a Class 3b or 4 control area, many laser users find that the interlock architecture creates functional impediments to their specific operations. We will examine some standard interlock strategies and their shortcomings, give an example of a situation where the interlock architecture itself contributed to a dangerous incident, and finally, describe a new interlock philosophy which we have been successfully using at Berkeley Laboratory for the past year.
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 Laser Institute of America.
1997
Laser Institute of America
You do not currently have access to this content.