It is well-known that dazzle, flash-blindness and afterimages may be caused by bright visible optical radiation, but functional relations are not a matter of common knowledge up to now.

Since there exist several work areas and places where it might become very important not to be impaired to much as far as visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and color vision are concerned, like working with machines or at height, with high voltages, driving a vehicle or flying an aircraft, it was the goal of a study to determine the most important relationships and to compare laser and LEDs as far as the capability of temporary blinding is concerned.

Two different laser devices, namely a helium-neon laser (632.8 nm), and a frequency-doubled Nd:Yttrium Vanadate laser (Nd:YVO4 laser, 532 nm) as well as 4 different so-called high brightness LEDs (HB-LEDs) (red, green, royal blue, and white) have been applied as a dazzling light source. The maximum power levels which have been used were kept at least 20 percent below the maximum permissible exposure limits in the case of laser radiation and a factor of 8 up to 20 as far as LED radiation is concerned.

A total of 19 persons have been tested with laser light and 26 with LEDs. The exposure duration was chosen between 0.25 s and 10 s and various optical power levels have been adjusted. The resulting temporary impairment was determined either with a standard visual acuity measuring system or in a specially developed computer-assisted reading test. Especially the respective disability threshold as a function of exposure duration has been searched and wavelength-dependent values have been found for both laser and LED radiation.

The received functional relationships might be used for the derivation of protection limits as far as indirect effects like temporary blinding are concerned.

1.

Directive 2006/25/EC of the European Parliament and the European Council of 5 April 2006 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC), OJ L 114, 27.4.2006, p.38.

2.
IEC 60825-1 {Ed. 2.0}:
2007
-03.
Safety of laser products - Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
.
3.
IEC 62471 - Ed. 1.0:
2006
-07.
Photobiological safety of lamps and lamp systems
.
4.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
&
Hofmann
,
J.
(
2004
)
Results of lab and field trials regarding the eye blink reflex as a safety means for LEDs, Proceedings of the CIE symposium ‘04: LED light sources
.
Tokyo
7-8 June 2004
. CIE x026:
2004
,
67
70
.
5.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2007
)
Some quantitative aspects of temporary blinding from high brightness LEDs
.
Proc. SPIE Vol. 6426 Ophthalmic Technologies XVII
,
Manns
,
F.
;
Söderberg
,
P. G.
;
Ho
,
A.
;
Stuck
,
B. E.
;
Belkin
,
M.
(eds.),
642629-1
64629-10
.
6.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2007
)
Local Susceptibility of the Retina, Formation and Duration of Afterimages in the Case of Class 1 Laser Products and Disability Glare Arising from HB-LEDs, ILSC 2007, Conference Proceedings
p.
102
111
.
7.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2008
)
Determination of the time dependence of colored afterimages. Ophthalmic Technologies XVIII
. Edited by
Manns
,
F.
,
Söderberg
,
P.G.
,
Ho
,
A.
,
Stuck
,
B.E.
&
Belkin
,
M.
Proceedings of the SPIE
, Volume
6844
, pp.
68441N
68441N-9
.
8.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2008
)
Color and contrast sensitivity after glare from high-brightness LEDs. Ophthalmic Technologies XVIII
. Edited by
Manns
,
F.
,
Söderberg
,
P.G.
,
Ho
,
A.
,
Stuck
,
B.E.
&
Belkin
,
M.
Proceedings of the SPIE
, Volume
6844
, pp.
68441R
68441R-8
.
9.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
,
Ott
,
G.
,
Janßen
,
M.
&
Brose
,
M.
(
2008
) Blendung durch optische Strahlungsquellen (in German; English abstract title: Dazzle caused by sources of optical radiation), Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund/ Berlin/Dresden, 407 pp. and 1. Auflage. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin 2008. ISBN: 978-3-88261-093-2, 407 Seiten, Projektnummer: F 2185, PDF-Datei (http://www.baua.de/nn_8514/de/Publikationen/Fachbeitraege/F2185.html?—nnn=true)
10.
ICNIRP
(
1996
)
Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Laser Radiation of Wavelengths between 180 nm and 1000 μm
.
Health Physics
71
,
804
819
.
11.
ICNIRP
(
1997
)
Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Broad-Band Incoherent Optical Radiation (0.38 to 3 μm)
.
Health Physics
73
,
539
553
.
12.
ICNIRP
(
2000
)
Revision of guidelines on limits for laser radiation of wavelengths between 400 nm and 1,400 nm
.
Health Physics
79
,
431
440
.
13.
ICNIRP
(
2000
)
ICNIRP Statement on light emitting diodes (LEDs) and laser diodes: implications for hazard assessment
.
Health Physics
78
,
744
752
.
14.
ANSIZ136.6
-
2005
, “
Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors
”,
Laser Institute of America
,
Orlando USA
15.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA Order JO 7400.2G
(
2008
) Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters (Part 6. Miscellaneous Procedures: Chapter 29. Outdoor Laser Operations)
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.