For any manufacturing process the high demand on the quality of the produced parts can only be guaranteed by continuous supervision. In particular this is a fact in laser materials processing. It is for this reason, that process monitoring systems become more and more standard devices in modern automotive laser applications. The task for reliable on-line process monitoring systems is to gain significant indicators for the instantaneous condition of the interaction zone and/or neighbouring areas. Depending on the application it is essential to select the most reliable system configuration.

As presented by Precitec in former publications, there is a possibility to monitor processes with various kinds of sensors, starting from photo diode based sensors to a camera as a sensor to extract as much information as possible from the interaction zone between the laser and the work piece. Precitec is following this strategy since several years now and was very successful in integrating numerous monitoring systems into industrial production lines. This paper will describe new approaches in the field of process monitoring, the combination of various sensor technologies. It is for sure, that future production plants will try to reduce the factor human resources dramatically, which in the end means a higher degree of automation. This degree of automation can only be reached by closed loop control and the basis is absolutely reliable, industrial proofed monitoring systems. The paper will show, how one can increase the degree of reliability by the intelligent fusion of sensor systems. By using this sensor configuration the monitoring system will mainly focus on typical seam irregularities, which can occur in the specific application because of material or laser related problems, in TWB applications e.g. pinholes, undercut, missing laser power, etc. All the possible welding problems because of misalignment can be neglected.

1.
Abels
,
P.
;
Kratzsch
,
C.
;
Schulz
,
W.
;
Kaierle
,
S.
;
Poprawe
,
R.
;
ICALEO 1999
,
87
(
1999
)
E-99
2.
Kaierle
,
S.
;
Abels
,
P.
;
Kapper
,
G.
;
Kratzsch
,
C.
;
Michel
,
J.
;
Schulz
,
W.
;
Poprawe
,
R.
;
ICALEO 2001
(
2001
)
E-12
3.
Müller
,
M.
;
Dausinger
,
F.
:On-line-Detektion innerer Nahtqualität beim Laserstrahltiefschweißen. In:
Dilthey
,
U.
(Hrsg.):
Qualifizierung von Laserverfahren, Abschlusspräsentation des gleichnamigen BMBFProjektverbands im Rahmen von Laser
2000
(DVS-Berichte, Bd. 205).
Düsseldorf
:
DVS-Verlag GmbH
1999
, S.
106
.
4.
Müller
,
M.
;
Dausinger
,
F.
;
Hügel
,
H.
; “
Online process monitoring of laser welding by measuring the reflected laser power
”;
Proc. ICALEO
1998
, LIA Vol. 85c
5.
Kogel-Hollacher
,
M.
;
Jurca
,
M.
;
Dietz
,
C.
;
Janssen
,
G.
;
Dávila Lozada
,
E.
; “
Quality Assurance in Pulsed Seam Laser Welding
”;
Proc. ICALEO 1998
, LIA Vol. 85c
6.
Dietz
,
C.
;
Jurca
,
M.
;
Schlichtermann
,
L.
;
Kogel-Hollacher
,
M.
;
Breitschwerdt
,
S.
;
Schmid
,
C.
;
Rowold
,
L.
; “
Closed-Loop Control System for Laser Welding of Transmission Parts
”,
Proc. ICALEO 1998
, LIA Vol. 85c
7.
Goth
,
K.
;
Herzinger
,
T.
;
Kogel-Hollacher
,
M
: “
Online quality assurance of laser welded edge joints in series production
”,
EALA 2002
8.
Kogel-Hollacher
,
M.
;
Nicolay
,
T.
;
Kattwinkel
,
A.
;
Müller
,
M. G.
;
Müller
;
J.
; “
On-Line Process Monitoring in Laser Materials Processing – Techniques for the Industrial Environment
”,
Proc PICALO 2004
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.