An efficient quality evaluation method is crucial for the applications of high-quality microhole arrays drilled with ultrafast lasers. The vision-based feature extraction was used as a data acquisition method to evaluate the drilling quality in terms of the geometric quality of the hole shape. However, the morphological features such as the recast layer, microcracks, and debris on the surface are difficult to consider in the quality evaluation since simultaneous recognition of multiple features remains challenging. Herein, we successfully recognized and extracted multiple features by deep learning, thus achieving the quality evaluation of microhole arrays in terms of both geometrical and surface qualities. Microhole arrays of various sizes and surface quality are fabricated on copper, stainless steel, titanium, and glass using different processing parameters. Then, the images of the microhole arrays are prepared as the dataset to train the deep learning network by labeling the typical features of microholes. The well-trained deep learning network has efficient and powerful recognition ability. Typical features such as the hole profile, recast layer, microcracks, and debris can be recognized and extracted simultaneously; thereby the geometric and surface quality of the microhole are obtained. We also demonstrate the implementation of the method with a fast quality evaluation of an array of 2300 microholes based on a statistical approach. The methods presented here extend the quality evaluation of microhole arrays by considering both geometric and surface qualities and can also be applied to quality monitoring in other ultrafast laser micromachining.

1.
Y.
Zhang
and
B.
Xie
, “
Investigation on hole diameter non-uniformity of hole arrays by ultrasonic vibration-assisted EDM
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
112
,
3083
3091
(
2021
).
2.
M. J. O.
Laakso
,
S.
Pagliano
,
U.
Shah
,
G. E.
Mårtensson
,
G.
Stemme
, and
F.
Niklaus
, “
Water in contact with the backside of a silicon substrate enables drilling of high-quality holes through the substrate using ultrashort laser pulses
,”
Opt. Express
28
,
1394
1407
(
2020
).
3.
Y.-M.
Lu
,
Y.-Z.
Duan
,
X.-Q.
Liu
,
Q.-D.
Chen
, and
H.-B.
Sun
, “
High-quality rapid laser drilling of transparent hard materials
,”
Opt. Lett.
47
,
921
924
(
2022
).
4.
D.-S.
Jin
,
K.-H.
Chun
, and
E.-S.
Lee
, “
Analysis of the current density characteristics in through-mask electrochemical micromachining (TMEMM) for fabrication of micro-hole arrays on invar alloy film
,”
Chin. J. Aeronaut.
30
,
1231
1241
(
2017
).
5.
R. R.
Gattass
and
E.
Mazur
, “
Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials
,”
Nat. Photonics
2
,
219
225
(
2008
).
6.
K.
Sugioka
and
Y.
Cheng
, “
Ultrafast lasers-reliable tools for advanced materials processing
,”
Light Sci. Appl.
3
,
e149
e149
(
2014
).
7.
Y.
Xie
,
D. J.
Heath
,
J. A.
Grant-Jacob
,
B. S.
Mackay
,
M. D. T.
McDonnell
,
M.
Praeger
,
R. W.
Eason
, and
B.
Mills
, “
Deep learning for the monitoring and process control of femtosecond laser machining
,”
J. Phys. Photonics
1
,
035002
(
2019
).
8.
H.
Wang
,
J.
Liu
,
Y.
Xu
,
X.
Wang
,
N.
Ren
,
X.
Ren
, and
Q.
Hu
, “
Experimental characterization and real-time monitoring for laser percussion drilling in titanium alloy using transverse electric field assistance and/or lateral air blowing
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
62
,
845
858
(
2021
).
9.
J.
Zhang
,
K.
Guan
,
Z.
Zhang
, and
Y.
Guan
, “
In vitro evaluation of ultrafast laser drilling large-size holes on sheepshank bone
,”
Opt. Express
28
,
25528
25544
(
2020
).
10.
W.
Lin
,
H.
Shen
,
J.
Fu
, and
S.
Wu
, “
Online quality monitoring in material extrusion additive manufacturing processes based on laser scanning technology
,”
Precis. Eng.
60
,
76
84
(
2019
).
11.
S. A.
Shevchik
,
T.
Le-Quang
,
F. V.
Farahani
,
N.
Faivre
,
B.
Meylan
,
S.
Zanoli
, and
K.
Wasmer
, “
Laser welding quality monitoring via graph support vector machine with data adaptive kernel
,”
IEEE Access
7
,
93108
93122
(
2019
).
12.
I. H.
Kao
,
Y. W.
Hsu
,
Y. H.
Lai
, and
J. W.
Perng
, “
Laser cladding quality monitoring using coaxial image based on machine learning
,”
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.
69
,
2868
2880
(
2020
).
13.
W.
Cai
,
P.
Jiang
,
L.
Shu
,
S.
Geng
, and
Q.
Zhou
, “
Real-time identification of molten pool and keyhole using a deep learning-based semantic segmentation approach in penetration status monitoring
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
76
,
695
707
(
2022
).
14.
L.
Tatzel
,
O.
Al Tamimi
,
T.
Haueise
, and
F.
Puente León
, “
Image-based modelling and visualisation of the relationship between laser-cut edge and process parameters
,”
Opt. Laser Technol.
141
,
107028
(
2021
).
15.
W.
Sun
,
J.
Yi
,
G.
Ma
,
F.
Li
,
X.
Li
,
G.
Feng
, and
C.
Lu
, “
A vision-based method for dimensional in situ measurement of cooling holes in aero-engines during laser beam drilling process
,”
Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
119
,
3265
3277
(
2022
).
16.
J.
Li
,
Q.
Zhou
,
X.
Huang
,
M.
Li
, and
L.
Cao
, “
In situ quality inspection with layer-wise visual images based on deep transfer learning during selective laser melting
,”
J. Intell. Manuf.
34
,
853
867
(
2023
).
17.
M.
AY
, “
Modelling of the hole quality characteristics by extreme learning machine in fiber laser drilling of Ti-6Al-4V
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
36
,
138
148
(
2018
).
18.
A. M.
Hafiz
and
G. M.
Bhat
, “
A survey on instance segmentation: State of the art
,”
Int. J. Multimed. Inf. Retr.
9
,
171
189
(
2020
).
19.
Y.
Fu
,
A. R. J.
Downey
,
L.
Yuan
,
T.
Zhang
,
A.
Pratt
, and
Y.
Balogun
, “
Machine learning algorithms for defect detection in metal laser-based additive manufacturing: A review
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
75
,
693
710
(
2022
).
20.
F. G.
Fischer
,
M. G.
Zimmermann
,
N.
Praetzsch
, and
C.
Knaak
, “
Monitoring of the powder bed quality in metal additive manufacturing using deep transfer learning
,”
Mater. Des.
222
,
111029
(
2022
).
21.
W.
Chen
,
B.
Zou
,
J.
Yang
,
C.
Huang
,
P.
Yao
, and
J.
Liu
, “
The machined surface defect detection of improved superpixel segmentation and two-level region aggregation based on machine vision
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
80
,
287
301
(
2022
).
22.
Y.
Sha
,
Z.
He
,
H.
Gutierrez
,
J.
Du
,
W.
Yang
, and
X.
Lu
, “
The intelligent detection method for flip chips using CBN-S-Net algorithm with SAM images
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
83
,
60
67
(
2022
).
23.
V.
Pandiyan
,
D.
Cui
,
T.
Le-Quang
,
P.
Deshpande
,
K.
Wasmer
, and
S.
Shevchik
, “
In situ quality monitoring in direct energy deposition process using co-axial process zone imaging and deep contrastive learning
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
81
,
1064
1075
(
2022
).
24.
H.
Kim
,
K.
Nam
,
Y.
Kim
, and
H.
Ki
, “
Analysis of laser-beam absorptance and keyhole behavior during laser keyhole welding of aluminum alloy using a deep-learning-based monitoring system
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
80
,
75
86
(
2022
).
25.
F.
Kaji
,
H.
Nguyen-Huu
,
A.
Budhwani
,
J. A.
Narayanan
,
M.
Zimny
, and
E.
Toyserkani
, “
A deep-learning-based in-situ surface anomaly detection methodology for laser directed energy deposition via powder feeding
,”
J. Manuf. Process.
81
,
624
637
(
2022
).
26.
Y.
Wu
,
A.
Kirillov
,
F.
Massa
,
W.-Y.
Lo
, and
R.
Girshick
, “Detectron2,” https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2
27.
A.
Bharatish
,
H. N.
Narasimha Murthy
,
B.
Anand
,
C. D.
Madhusoodana
,
G. S.
Praveena
, and
M.
Krishna
, “
Characterization of hole circularity and heat affected zone in pulsed CO2 laser drilling of alumina ceramics
,”
Opt. Laser Technol.
53
,
22
32
(
2013
).
28.
See supplementary material online for supplemental document: data related to the training process and recognition results of the deep learning network, including Figs. S1–S9, Table S1, and Note S1–S2. Video S1: dynamic recognition of microhole arrays. Source code: code for feature labeling in dataset preparation, training, and feature extraction with deep learning network.

Supplementary Material

You do not currently have access to this content.