The rules and regulations restricting hand-held lasers at a national level may be revisited in light of the anticipated health risks posed to the population. It seems that some current regulations may be overly restrictive, e.g. when laser pointers belonging to Class 3R (or Class IIIA) are forbidden or not made available to consumers. The risks posed by this product category are neither serious nor high, and should thus not be subject to stringent regulations apart from market surveillance activities including information efforts. Generally speaking, occupational health regulations satisfactorily address risks posed by lasers in occupational settings and can be trusted when it comes to harnessing the use of powerful hand-held lasers as well. But it is proposed that legitimate use of powerful hand-held lasers needs to subject to some additional restrictions in order to limit illicit use. It is also suggested that the rules and regulations should be based on risk evaluations rather than on the present laser classes.

1.
International Electrotechnical Commission
(
2014
)
IEC 60825-1 Ed 3.0: Safety of laser products – Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
.
2.
Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93, O.J. L 218/30.
3.
Swedish Radiation Protection Ordinance (2018:506
).
4.
Directive 2006/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation), O.J. L 114/38
.
5.
The Supreme Court of Sweden
(
2017
)
Case no Ö
4833
16
.
6.
Upper court of the Swedish upper north
(
2018
)
Case no B
518
18
.
7.
Sliney
DH
,
Mellerio
J
,
Gabel
VP
,
Schulmeister
K.
(
2002
)
What is the meaning of threshold in laser injury experiments? Implications for human exposure limits
,
Health Phys.
82
:
335
347
.
8.
Commission Decision No. 2010/15/EU (Rapex Guidelines), O.J. L 22/1.
9.
Lindgren
M.
(
2017
)
Class 3R laser pointers do not pose a ‘serious risk’ in the EU Rapex system
.
Proceeding of the International Laser Safety Conference 2017
,
LIA
, paper #602, p
227
229
.
10.
Massof
RW
(
2002
)
The measurement of vision disability
,
Optometry and vision science
,
79
:
516
552
.
11.
Schulmeister
K.
(
2008
)
Laser – Sources of optical radiation only at the workplace?
,
Abstracts of the 6th international NIR workshop of ICNIRP 2008
, session 2.
12.
Schulmeister
K.
(
2011
)
The widely varying risks from class 3R laser products in light of the revision of IEC 60825-1
,
Proceeding of the International Laser Safety Conference 2011
,
LIA
, paper #103, p
72
75
.
13.
Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety, O.J. L 11/4.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.