The laser technology has been for a long time confined to professional uses but is more and more integrated into consumer products and complex systems. In this regard, the particular case of 3R products has re-opened controversial and unconcluded discussions among experts concerning the safety requirements. In parallel, the European standardization organization CENELEC is about to give its conclusion to the European Commission on acceptable laser products for consumers. The task is quite complex, especially with respect to the modifications introduced in the calculation of the Admissible Emission Limits (AEL) in the 3rd edition of the laser norm IEC 60825-1. The classification of laser systems, based on the worst-case assumption, is not well reflecting the risk of the user exposition. Because of the moving beam condition it is unlikely for scanning systems to meet all worst-case conditions of multiple and independent parameters at the same time. Apart from this, some particular parameters concerning extended sources and pulsed sources classified 3R under the 3rd edition of the IEC 60825-1 are seen critical as the AEL can in some cases exceed known injury threshold values. We define in this paper the concept of a Continuously Scanning Laser System (CSLS) and analyze under these conditions the behavior of the AEL for these critical parameters. We finally conclude that CSLS products classified 3R belong to the low risk 3R group.

1.
Sliney
DH
(
2017
).
The History of Class 3A – A Review
, ILSC 2017 Paper 223
2.
Schulmeister
K
(
2017
).
Class 3R and the Upcoming Consumer Laser Safety Standard in Europe – A Challenge!
, ILSC 2017 Paper 604
3.
Schulmeister
K
(
2011
).
The Widely varying Risk from Class 3R Laser Products in Light of the Revision of IEC 60825-1
, ILSC 2011 Paper 103
4.
ICNIRP Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Laser Radiation of Wavelengths between 180 nm and 1,000µm
,
Health Physics
105
(
3
):
271
295
;
2013
5.
Kelly
MW
and
Lin
CP
(
1997
). Microcavitation and Cell Injury in RPE Cells Following Short-Pulsed Laser Irradiation,
Proc. Of SPIE
Vol.
2975
,
Laser-Tissue Interaction VIII
, June
1997
6.
Freund
DE
,
Sliney
DH
(
1999
).
Dependence of retinal model temperature calculations on beam shape and absorption coefficients
,
Lasers in the Life Science
1999
,
229
247
7.
Lund
DJ
,
Edsall
P
,
Stuck
B
,
Schulmeister
K
(
2007
). Variation of Laser-induced retinal Injury Thresholds with retinal irradiated Area: 0.1-s Duration, 514-nm Exposures,
Journal of Biomedical Optics
12
(
2
):
024023
; March/April
2007
8.
Schulmeister
K
,
Husinsky
J
,
Seiser
B
,
Edthofer
F
,
Fekete
B
,
Farmer
L
,
Lund
DJ
, (
2008
).
Ex vivo and Computer Model Study on retinal thermal Laser-induced Damage in the visible Wavelength Range
,
Journal of Biomedical Optics
13
:
054038
;
2008a
9.
Safety of laser products – Part 13: Measurements for classification of laser products, Technical report IEC/TR 60825-13 Edition 2.0 2011-10
10.
Zuclich
J. A.
,
Lund
D. J.
,
Till
S.
,
Hollins
R. C.
,
Kennedy
P. K.
and
McLin
L. N.
(
2008
).
New Data on the Variation of Laser induced Retinal-damage Threshold with retinal Image Size
,
Journal of Laser Applications
vol.
20
number
2
, may
2008
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.