In the wavelength range of 400 nm to 1400 nm, the retinal thermal exposure or emission limits depend on the angular subtense of the apparent source (Greek symbol “alpha”). For the case that a given laser beam is associated to an extended source, according to IEC 60825-1 or ANSI Z136.1 the emission permitted for a given class (such as Class 1) can be substantially higher as compared to the case of a small source. In this paper, earlier discussions on the classification concept to analyse extended sources are summarized and commented. While it is historically justified to refer to the “apparent source” such as when the optical source is a diffusor as the classical example of an extended source, the more general understanding and terminology is to associate “alpha” with the angular subtense of the retinal image, i.e. the irradiance profile on the retina. This is particularly important when the aperture stop on the imaging system (the eye) reduces significantly the retinal image as compared to the angular subtense of the source, which is possible for coherent and partially coherent beams. In a second part of the paper, modelling results for the potential impact of the aperture stop to reduce the retinal image are discussed for the example of two partially coherent beams.

1.
International Electrotechnical Commission
(
2014
) IEC 60825-1 Ed. 3.0: Safety of laser products – Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements.
2.
ANSI Z136.1 Safe Use of Lasers (
2014
)
Laser Institute of America
.
3.
ICNIRP
(
2013
)
ICNIRP Guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 1000 µm
,
Health Physics
105
(
3
).
4.
Schulmeister
K
(
2015
)
Classification of extended source products according to IEC 60825-1
,
ILSC 2015 Proceedings
Paper #C101, Page
271
280
.
5.
Schulmeister
K
(
2005
) The Apparent Source’ – A Multiple Misnomer,
Proceedings ILSC March 2005 Los Angeles
,
Laser Institute of America
, p.
91
98
.
6.
ISO 11146 Series title: Lasers and laser-related equipment — Test methods for laser beam widths, divergence angles and beam propagation ratios
7.
Schulmeister
K
,
Gilber
R
,
Edthofer
F
,
Seiser
B
and
Vees
G
(
2006
) Comparison of different beam diameter definitions to characterize thermal damage of the eye,
Proc. SPIE 6101 “Laser Beam Control and Applications”
,
61011A
8.
Henderson
R
and
Schulmeister
K
(
2004
)
Laser Safety
,
Taylor & Francis Group
,
New York, London
.
9.
Kotzur
S
,
Frederiksen
A
,
Wahl
S
(
2019
)
Consideration of wave phenomena for retinal image in laser safety evaluations
,
ILSC 2019
Paper 903.
10.
Friberg
A.T.
and
Turunen
J.
(
1988
):
Imaging of Gaussian Schell-model sources
;
J Opt Soc Am A
Vol
5
, p.
713
720
.
11.
Turunen
J.
(
2014
): Low-Coherence Laser Beams; Chapter 10 p
273
314
in:
Laser Beam Propagation
, Ed.:
Forbes
A
,
CRC Press
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.