Following a mandate issued by the European Commission to the European standardisation organisation CENELEC, a standard for laser products intended to be sold to consumers is currently developed. The main challenge is to decide if Class 3R products should they be generally permitted as consumer products, or only a subgroup, or not at all. To require the manufacturer to perform a risk analysis is another option that is followed up. This paper reports on some emission parameter combinations where exposure at five times the MPE for retinal thermal damage (the maximum permitted emission of Class 3R lasers) exceeds injury thresholds known from rhesus monkey experiments by more than a factor of two. Although there is data showing that there is some margin between the injury thresholds of the human and the rhesus monkey retina, it might not be sufficient to justify that all Class 3R lasers are sufficiently safe to be used as consumers without eye protection.

1.
International Electrotechnical Commission
(
2014
) IEC 60825-1 Ed. 3.0:
Safety of laser products – Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements
.
2.
Henderson
R.
and
Schulmeister
K.
(
2004
)
Laser Safety
,
New York, London
:
Taylor & Francis Group
.
3.
Sliney
D
&
Wolbarsht
M
(
1980
)
Safety with lasers and other optical sources
,
Springer
US
.
4.
Sliney
DH
,
Marshall
WJ
&
E.
Brumage Ch
(
2007
)
Rationale for laser classification measurement conditions
,
JLA 19
, pp
197
206
.
5.
Schulmeister
K
(
2010
)
Present and alternative dosimetry concept for laser exposure limits
,
Medical Laser Application
25
, pp
111
117
.
6.
Schulmeister
K
&
Jean
M
(
2010
)
The risk of retinal injury from Class 2 and visible Class 3R lasers, including medical laser aiming beams
,
Medical Laser Application
25
, pp.
99
110
.
7.
Schulmeister
K
(
2011
)
The widely varying risk from Class 3R laser products in light of the revision of IEC 60825-1
,
ILSC 2011
Paper 103, pp.
72
75
8.
Mandate M/531 (
2015
)
Commission implementing decision of 5.2.2015 on a standardisation request to the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation concerning consumer laser products
9.
General Product Safety Directive, GPSD
, (
2001
) Directive 2001/95/EC.
10.
Schulmeister
K
&
Vees
G
(
2005
) Principles for consistent application of the IEC laser product safety standard based on legal requirements,
ILSC March 2005 Los Angeles
, ISBN 0-912035-79-X,
Laser Institute of America
, pp
111
120
.
11.
European Union Commission Decision 2010/15/EU
,
Risk Assessment Guidelines for Consumer products
, pp
33
64
.
12.
Sliney
D.H.
,
Mellerio
J.
,
Gabel
V.P.
&
Schulmeister
K.
(
2002
)
What is the meaning of threshold in laser injury experiments?
Health Phys
82
:
335
347
.
13.
Schulmeister
K.
(
2013
),
The upcoming new editions of IEC 60825-1 and ANSI Z136.1 – Examples on Impact for Classification and Exposure Limits
;
ILSC 2013
paper #C102.
14.
Schulmeister
K
(
2016
) The new edition of the international laser product safety standard IEC 60825-1,
White Paper; Seibersdorf Labor GmbH
,
Austria
.
15.
Stuck
B.E.
(
1984
) Ocular susceptibility to laser radiation: human vs Rhesus monkey,
Letterman Army Institute of Research, Handbook of laser bioeffects assessment
volume
1
, Chapter 4,
San Francisco
.
16.
Zuclich
JA
,
Lund
DJ
,
Edsall
PR
,
Hollins
RC
,
Smith
PA
,
Stuck
BE
,
McLin
LN
,
Till
S.
(
2000
)
Variation of laser-induced retinal damage threshold with retinal image size
.
J Laser Appl
12
:
74
80
.
17.
ICNIRP
(
2013
)
Guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 1000 μm
;
Health Physics
105
(
3
):
271
295
.
18.
ANSI Z136.1
(
2014
)
Safe Use of Lasers
;
Laser Institute of America
19.
Lund
BJ
,
Lund
DJ
&
Edsall
PR
(
2014
)
Damage threshold from large retinal spot size repetitive-pulse laser exposures
Health Phys
.
107
:
292
299
.
20.
Lund
DJ
,
Edsall
P
,
Stuck
BE
,
Schulmeister
K.
(
2007
)
Variation of Laser-induced retinal injury thresholds with retinal irradiated area: 0.1 s duration, 514 nm exposures
.
J Biomed Opt
12
:
024023
.
21.
Schulmeister
K.
and
Daem
J.
(
2016
)
Risk of retinal injury from “Risk Group 2” laser illuminated projectors
,
J Laser Appl
28
:
042002
; doi: .
22.
Private communication Dr. Charles Campbell
,
Sept
. 20th
2014
23.
Private communication Dr. Frank Schäffel
,
Sept
, 17th
2014
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.