The popular perception of laser safety is dominated by the radiation hazard, whilst this may be accurate in a few instances the majority of laser applications generate a family of hazards which are far more significant and life-threatening than that of the direct radiation hazard. The laser is over 50 years old and really laser safety analysis has changed little in that period. Having been active in the field of laser safety for over 25 years and seeing little change in attitude raises the question “is there another way to approach the task?” In other sectors comparing and communicating risks and hazards have tried to use the basis of risk as a one in 1 million chance of death, the so-called ‘micro-mort’. Other risks which don’t kill you directly but reduce your life expectancy can be quantified using the micro-life which is a 30 minute reduction in your life expectancy. Examination of the hazard families from various laser processes has been looked at in this paper and suitable micro-mort and micro-life comparisons have been derived. This has enabled quantification of the fume burden in laser material processing, the medical smoke hazard to both patient and operating staff as well as other reported fatal and near fatal incidents. This approach has enabled a levelling of measurement/cost to the various issues in an attempt to rank and/or value various hazards. Assessment in units relevant to the individual can produce a prioritisation within the safety analysis.

1.
“The Norm Chronicles: Stories and numbers about danger”, Michael Blastland and David Spiegelhalter, Profile Books
2014
2.
OSHA
,
Safety and Health Topics Page, Welding, Cutting, and Brazing
2014
3.
HSE Report “Health and safety in manufacturing in Great Britain,– Work related injuries and ill health” October
2013
4.
HSE RR922 Research Report
Evidence for exposure and harmful effects of diathermy plumes (surgical smoke) - Evidence based literature review
”, Alan Beswick & Gareth Evans
2012
5.
Surgical Smoke – A Review of the Literature
” William Barrett & Shawn Garber,
2004
Jnl of Global Surgery
6.
Royal College of Nursing report “members exposure to surgical smoke”
2010
7.
Surgical smoke – A health hazard in the operating theatre: A study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units
”,
D.S.
Hill
,
J.K.
O’Neill
,
R.J.
Powell
,
D.W.
Oliver
,
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Volume
65
, Issue
7
, Pages
911
916
, July
2012
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.