Reflection of a laser beam from a surface depends on the optical properties of the surface, and can have components that are diffuse (in all directions) or specular (in one direction). Hazard distances tend to be short and easily calculated for diffuse reflections. However, specular reflections have longer hazard distances and their calculation poses challenges due to the spatial and temporal characteristics of the reflected beam. We have developed and refined a methodology to calculate hazard distances from specular reflections. This methodology uses analytical expressions to determine the irradiance and exposure time of the reflected beam, from which hazard distances are calculated. The method accounts for the properties of the incident beam, the material reflecting properties, and the shape of the surface.

The motivations and concepts of the specular methodology are presented, along with the equations resulting from this approach. The spatial and temporal characteristics of the reflected beam for a specific laser and surface are calculated from the application of these equations. These characteristics are then used to determine either localization of hazardous regions in the surrounding space or a description of possible hazards at specific locations. Examples of the application of the specular methodology are presented with their corresponding hazardous conditions.

1.
Keppler
,
K
,
Megaloudis
,
G.
,
Early
,
E.
,
Kennedy
,
P.
&
Thomas
,
R
(
2008
)
Reflected Laser Hazard Analysis Methodology to Support HEL Field Testing
, AFRL-RH-BR-TR-2008-0029.
2.
Early
,
E.
,
Megaloudis
,
G.
,
Kennedy
,
P.
&
Thomas
,
R.
(
2010
)
Methodology for Reflected Laser Beam Hazard Analyses
,
Journal of Directed Energy
3
,
320
342
.
3.
Early
,
E.
,
Megaloudis
,
G.
,
Zohner
,
J.
,
Kennedy
,
P.
&
Thomas
,
R
(
2012
)
Extension of Reflected Laser Hazard Methodology to Ground Observers
,
Journal of Directed Energy
4
,
275
293
.
4.
Early
,
E.
,
Megaloudis
,
G.
,
Zohner
,
J.
,
Kennedy
,
P.
&
Thomas
,
R
(
2014
)
Incorporation of Probabilistic Effects in Reflected Laser Hazard Methodology
,
Journal of Directed Energy
5
,
105
128
.
5.
Early
,
E.
,
Megaloudis
,
G.
,
Bailey
,
A.
,
Zohner
,
J.
,
Kennedy
,
P.
&
Thomas
,
R.
(
2013
)
A Comparison of Reflected Laser Models – HELCAT and the Specular Methodology
, AFRL-RH-FS-TR-2013-0006.
6.
Early
,
E.
,
Bailey
,
A.
,
Tessier
,
P.
,
Kumru
,
S.
,
Vickery
,
R.
&
Thomas
,
R.
(
2014
)
Implementation of the Specular Methodology in Simulation Tools – Description and Comparisons
, AFRL-RH-FS-TR-2014-xxxx.
7.
American National Standards Institute
(
2007
)
American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers
, ANSI Standard Z136.1-2007,
Laser Institute of America
,
Orlando, FL
.
8.
Ahmed
,
E.
,
Early
,
E.
,
Huantes
,
D.
,
Thomas
,
R
&
Wooddell
,
D.
(
2009
)
A Probabilistic 1064 nm Dose Response Model Version 1.0
, AFRL-RH-BR-TR-2009-0021.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.