The recent development of light-based laser and intense light devices for consumer use with or without physician direction has raised new challenges in safety standards and regulatory requirements for these appliances.

Home-use laser products have emission levels from “embedded” lasers that would ordinarily result in their having laser hazard classifications of 3B or 4, but because of design features and interlocks, cannot emit radiation which is hazardous to the eye when the product is in contact with the skin. When not in contact with the skin, emission is normally disabled anyway. With no outside emission, safety control measures in current horizontal standards do not make much sense. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has therefore defined a new laser Class 1C in its draft revisions to IEC standard 60825-1. Since laser appliances of laser Class 1C are diverse products, safety requirements may be too general if contained in the horizontal laser safety standard. Therefore, the general IEC 60825-1 only allows laser Class 1C to be attributed by a manufacturer to it’s product when a vertical safety standard exists which contains specific safety requirements which cover eye and skin hazards posed by the respective product (such as appliances for hair removal and skin rejuvenation).

Whilst no equivalent ocular hazard generally arises with home-use intense light sources (ILS), higher Risk Group “embedded” ILS sources which pose a risk for the skin could conceivably be employed in home-use devices for certain applications (e.g. acne therapy).

If this new laser classification is approved, the vertical standards will specify the appropriate design, engineering, reliability, test methods, labelling and instructional controls required for safe consumer use. This paper gives an overview of the recent state of development of a vertical standard which includes lasers categorized laser Class 1C, in the IEC 60335 series.

1.
Dougal
,
G.
,
Kelley
,
P.
(
2001
)
A pilot study of treatment of herpes labialis with 1072 nm narrow waveband light
.
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
26
,
149
154
.
2.
Hargate
,
G.
(
2006
)
A randomised double-blind study comparing the effect of 1072-nm light against placebo for the treatment of herpes labialis
.
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
31
,
638
641
.
3.
Webb
,
C.
,
Dyson
,
M.
,
Lewis
,
W.H.
(
1998
)
Stimulatory effect of 660-nm low level laser energy on hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts: possible mechanisms for increase in cell counts
.
Lasers Surg. Med.
22
, (
5
),
294
301
.
4.
Ceylan
,
Y.
,
Hizmetli
,
S.
,
Silig
,
Y.
(
2003
)
The effects of infrared laser and medical treatments on pain and serotonin degradation products in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a controlled trial
,
Rheumatol. Int.
24
,
260
263
.
5.
Pereira
,
A.N.
,
Eduardo Cde.
,
P.
,
Matson
,
E.
,
Marques
,
M.M.
(
2002
)
Effect of low-power laser irradiation on cell growth and procollagen synthesis of cultured fibroblasts
,
Lasers Surg. Med.
31
,
263
267
.
6.
Papageorgiou
,
P.
,
Katsambas
,
A.
,
Chu
,
A.
(
2000
)
Phototherapy with blue (415 nm) and red (660 nm) light in the treatment of acne vulgaris
,
Br. J. Dermatol.
142
,
973
978
.
7.
Wheeland
,
R.G.
(
2007
)
Simulated consumer use of a battery-powered, handheld, portable diode laser (810 nm) for hair removal: a safety, efficacy and ease-of-use study
.
Lasers Surg. Med.
39
,
476
493
.
8.
Alster
,
T.S.
,
Tanzi
,
E.L.
(
2009
)
Effect of a novel, low-energy pulsed-light device for home-use hair removal
,
Dermatol. Surg.
35
,
483
489
.
9.
Emerson
,
R.
,
Town
,
G.
(
2009
)
Hair removal with a novel, low fluence, home-use intense pulsed light device: preliminary results
,
J Cosmet. Laser Ther.
11
,
98
105
.
10.
Beilin
,
G.
(
2011
)
Home-use TriPollar RF device for facial skin tightening: Clinical study results
,
J. Cosmetic Laser Ther.
13
,
69
76
.
11.
Leyden
,
J.
,
Stephens
,
T.J.
,
Herndon
,
J.H.
(
2012
)
Multicenter clinical trial of a home-use nonablative fractional laser device for wrinkle reduction
,
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.
67
, (
5
),
975
984
.
12.
SSK Commission on Radiological Protection
. Risks from the use of lasers on human skin. (
2000
) Recommendation of the Commission on Radiological Protection. Adopted on the occasion of the 169th meeting of the Commission on Radiation Protection on 31 October 2000.
14.
A model regulatory program for medical devices: An international guide.
Washington, DC
:
PAHO
2001
. At: http://new.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2009/AmodelRegulatoryProgramforMedicalDevices_AnIntemalGuide.pdf (last accessed January 7th 2013).
15.
Medical device regulations global overview and guiding principles
. At: http://www.who.int/medical_devices/publications/en/MD_Regulations.pdf (last accessed January 7th 2013).
16.
Harmonization of Regulation-Challenges and Benefits
. At: http://www.who.int/medical_devices/00_co_chair_brief_noboru_takamura_reg.pdf (last accessed January 7th 2013).
17.
Lampf
,
S.
(
2012
)
Regulation of medical devices outside the European Union
,
J. R. Soc. Med.
105
:
S12
S21
.
18.
Ito
,
M.
,
Manda
,
K.
,
Oi
,
T.
,
Watanabe
,
S.
,
Kikuchi
,
M.
,
Shiba
,
A.
,
Ishibashi
I.
(
2009
)
Guidelines and the test method on the safety for beauty apparatus using rays
(Revised on March 1 st 2009)
Japan Aesthetic Dermatology Symposium
. Vol.
2
No.
1
,
34
36
. At: http://www.jp-ads.com/img/kiki.pdf (last accessed January 7th 2013).
19.
Omi
,
T.
(
2011
)
Data presented at the Home-Use Devices Symposium, 5 Continents Conference, Cannes
(
3st August 2011
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.