As dermatological lasers employed for skin resurfacing, “rejuvenation,” and hair removal move from the dermatology clinic to the spa and even home-use, manufacturers have made great improvements in system safety. With contact sensors and other “smart” sensors that test for skin type, the laser product will only fire when the appropriate contact conditions are present and there is no potential eye hazard. Technically these products must be labeled as Class 4, but there is no need for eye protection or any other conventional control measures appropriate for Class 4. The authors propose a new Class 1 designation for “eye-safe” lasers that would meet appropriate conditions. The skin exposure could exceed the skin MPEs in the treatment area, but there would be a limit on the radiant exposure to minimize severe skin injury.

1.
Sliney
D. H.
and
Trokel
S. L.
(
1992
)
Medical Lasers and Their Safe Use
,
New York
,
Springer-Verlag
.
2.
Sliney
D. H.
, (
1992
)
Laser safety for plastic surgery and dermatology
,
Lasers in Plastic Surgery and Dermatology
, pps
176
184
,
New York
,
Thieme Medical Publishers
.
3.
Ball
,
K.A.
, (
2004
)
Lasers: The Perioperative Challenge
. 3rd Edn.,
Denver
,
AORN
.
4.
ANSI, Safe Use of Lasers
, Standard Z136.1-2007, American National Standards Institutes, Laser Institute of America,
Orlando, FL
,
2007
.
5.
ANSI
, Safe Use of Lasers in Health Care Facilities, Standard Z136.3-2005,
American National Standards Institute, Laser Institute of America
,
Orlando, FL
,
2005
.
6.
Standards Association of Australia
,
Guide to the safe use of lasers in health care
. Standard AS/NZS 417. Standards
Australia, Sydney
,
2004
.
7.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Technical Report IEC TR 60825-8,
Safety of laser products – Part 8: Guidelines for the safe use of laser beams on humans
, 2nd Edn.,
2006
.
8.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
,
Laser Product Performance Standard
, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1040,
Washington, DC
,
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), US Government Printing Office
.
9.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
,
Radiation Safety of Laser Protects, Equipment Classification, and Users Guide, Standard 60825-1
, Edn.2,
IEC
,
Geneva
,
2007
.
10.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
,
Medical electrical equipment – Part 2-22: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of surgical, therapeutic and diagnostic laser equipment, IEC 60601-2-22
Ed.3,
2007
.
11.
Ahluwalia
,
G.
(ed.) (
2009
)
Cosmetics Applications of Laser & Light-Based Systems
,
Norwich
,
William Andrew Publishers
.
12.
Ries
WR
,
Clymer
MA
, and
Reinisch
L
,
Laser safety features of eye shields
.
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
.
18
(
3
):
309
315
(
1996
).
13.
Rohrich
RJ
,
Gyimesi
IM
,
Clark
P
, and
Burns
AJ
,
CO2 Laser safety considerations in facial skin resurfacing
.
Plastic Reconstr Surg
.
100
(
5
):
1285
1290
,
1997
.
14.
Sliney
,
D. H.
, (
2009
)
Eye safety of laser and light-based devices
, in:
Ahluwalia
,
G.
(ed.)
Cosmetics Applications of Laser & Light-Based Systems
,
Norwich
,
William Andrew Publishers
, pp.
499
516
.
15.
Brilakis
HS
,
Holland
EHJ
,
Diode-laser-induced cataract and iris atrophy as a complication of eyelid hair removal
,
Am J Ophthalmol
,
137
:
762
763
,
2004
.
16.
Wessely
D
,
Lieb
W.
Ocular complications of diode laser epilation in the face: loss of pupillary symmetry and pigment layer defect as well as coagulation of the ciliary body with intraocular inflammation caused by laser treatment [German]
,
Ophthalmologe
,
99
:
60
61
,
2002
.
17.
Herbold
TM
,
Busse
H
,
Uhlig
CE
,
Bilateral cataract and corectopia after laser eyebrow epilation
.
Ophthalmology
,
113
(
6
):
984
,
2006
[with comment in Ophthalmology, 114(3):624; author reply 624-5, 2007.
18.
Hammes
S
,
Augustin
A
,
Raulin
C
,
Okenfels
H-M
, and
Fischer
E
,
Pupil damage after periorbital laser treatment of a port-wine stain
,
Arch Dermatol
,
143
:
392
394
,
2007
.
19.
Le Jeune
M
,
Autié
M
,
Monnet
D
,
Brézin
AP
.
Ocular complications after laser epilation of eyebrows
.
Eur J Dermatol
.
17
(
6
):
553
4
,
2007
.
20.
Widder
RA
,
Severin
M
,
Kirchof
B
, and
Krieglstein
GK
,
Corneal injury after carbon dioxide laser skin resurfacing
,
Am J Ophthalmol
,
125
:
392
394
,
1998
.
21.
Pham
RT
,
Tzekov
RT
,
Biesman
BS
,
Marmor
MF
,
Retinal evaluation after 810 nm diode laser removal of eyelashes
,
Dermatol. Surg
. Sep;
28
(
9
):
836
40
,
2002
.
22.
Nelson
,
C. C.
,
Pasyk
,
K. A.
,
Dootz
,
G. I.
,
Eye shield for patients undergoing laser treatment
,
Am J Ophthalmol
,”
110
(
1
):
39
44
,
1990
.
23.
Seckel
,
BR
,
Kovanda
,
CJ
,
Cetrulo
CL.
Jr
,
Passmore
AK
,
Meneses
PG
,
White
T.
Laser blepharoplasty with transconjunctival orbicularis muscle/septum tightening and periocular skin resurfacing: A safe and advantageous technique
.
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
.
106
(
5
):
1127
1141
,
2000
.
24.
Jeffrey
HTS
,
Zelickson
B
,
Dover
JS
,
Kilmer
S
,
Burns
J
,
Hruza
G
Brown
DB
,
Bernstein
EF
,
Multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of a 585 nm pulsed-dye laser for the nonablative treatment of facial rhytides
Dermatologic Surgery
31
(
1
):
1
9
,
2005
.
25.
Banks
,
T.J.
, and
Ahluwalia
,
G.S.
, (
2009
)
FDA regulations for investigation and approval of medical devices: Laser and light-based systems
, in:
Ahluwalia
,
G.
(ed.),
Cosmetics Applications of Laser & Light-Based Systems
,
Norwich
,
William Andrew Publishers
, pp.
499
516
.
26.
Moretti
,
M.
, (
2009
)
Light-based devices for home use
, in:
Ahluwalia
,
G.
(ed.),
Cosmetics Applications of Laser & Light-Based Systems
,
Norwich
,
William Andrew Publishers
, pp.
499
516
.
27.
Sliney
,
D. H.
,
Smirnov
,
M.
,
Yaroslavsky
,
I.
,
Altshuler
,
G.
,
Batchvarova
,
N.
(
2009
)
Classification of laser systems using advanced eye safety devices
, presented at the
American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery
,
March 2009
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.