Laser safety standards such as ANSI Standard Z136-1, ACGIH TLVs, the laser exposure guidelines of the International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), and other documents typically have standardized on a minimal angular subtense for “point sources” referred to as “alpha-min” (αmin), which is 1.5 milliradians. This angle corresponds to a retinal image of 25.5 μm. This has become a standardized construct. The actual minimum optical image, known as the “point-spread function” is considerably smaller than 25 μm, depending upon how it is measured. Vision research studies of the optical performance of the human eye show that the point-spread function is nearly diffraction limited for a 2-mm pupil characteristic of an outdoor environment but it becomes several times larger than the diffraction limit for 7-mm pupil. The current MPEs for intrabeam viewing (“point”-source) for pulse durations from 1 ns to 0.25 date back to 1972 and have remained unchanged for visible and near-infrared lasers s for at least three decades. In 1972, the size of the minimal retinal image was of great interest and the subject of spirited discussions regarding worst-case ocular exposure conditions within the ANSI committee, and the basis for the 10-fold safety factor for deriving intrabeam-viewing MPEs was an outcome of that debate. Prior to 1972, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), which then established the only world-wide recognized set of limits, had provided three sets of MPEs—for 3, 5 and 7-mm pupil sizes. There are clear differences in the biological hazards depending upon the diameter of the laser beam if less than 7-mm and pupil size, but these are often neglected today, as safety standards have evolved to simplify hazard determination. Recent studies by Zuclich and Lund have shown the difficulties of achieving an apparent minimal retinal spot less than ∼80 μm. It is clear that any revision of the current MPEs for retinal hazards must consider the optical performance of the human eye for minimal images, where both corneal aberrations and small-angle forward scattering reduce the actual energy deposited within a retinal image corresponding to (αmin).

1.
American National Standards Institute
,
American National Standard for the Safe Use of Lasers
, American National Standard Z-136;1993,
American National Standards Institute
,
New York
(
1973
).
2.
ANSI
(
2000
) American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers (ANSI 136.1),
The Laser Institute of America
.
Orlando, Fl.
.
3.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)
,
Guidelines on Limits for Laser Radiation of Wavelengths between 180 nm and 1,000 μm
,
Health Phys
,
71
(
5
):
804
819
,
1996
.
4.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)
,
2000
,
Revision of guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 400 nm and 1.4 μm
.
Health Physics
,
79
(
4
):
431
440
.
5.
Solon
L.R.
,
R.
Aronson
and
G.
Gould
(
1961
),
Physiological implications of laser beams
,
Science
,
134
:
1506
1508
.
6.
Zaret
,
M.M.
,
Breinin
,
GM
,
Schmidt
,
H
,
Rips
,
H.
,
Siegel
,
IM
,
Ocular lesions produced by an optical maser (laser)
,
Science
,
134
:
1505
.
7.
Sliney
,
D. H.
and
Palmisano
,
W. A.
,
The evaluation of laser hazards
,
Am Industr Hyg Assn J
,
29
:
325
431
(September-October
1968
).
8.
Sliney
,
D.
&
Wolbarsht
,
M.
(
1980
)
Safety with lasers and other optical sources, a comprehensive handbook
,
Plenum Press
,
NY
,
1000
pp.
9.
Sliney
,
D.H.
, and
Freasier
,
B.C.
,
Evaluation of optical radiation hazards
,
Applied Optics
,
12
(
1
):
1
24
, (
1973
).
10.
R. G.
King
and
W. J.
Geeraets
,
The effect of q-switched laser radiation upon the retinal pigment epithelium in vitro
,
Acta Opthalmolgica
,
46
:
617
632
,
1968
.
11.
J.R.
Hayes
and
M.L.
Wolbarsht
,
Thermal model for retinal damage induced by pulsed lasers
,
J. Aerospace Med.
,
39
:
474
480
,
1968
.
12.
Sliney
,
D.H.
,
Mellerio
,
J.
,
Gabel
,
V.P.
&
Schulmeister
,
K.
(
2002
)
What is the meaning of threshold in laser injury experiments? Implications for human exposure limits
,
Health Phys
82
,
335
347
.
13.
Sliney
,
D.H.
(
1999
)
Retinal injury from laser radiation
,
Nonlinear Optics
21
,
1
17
.
14.
Geeraets
,
W.J.
&
Berry
,
E.R.
(
1968
)
Ocular spectral characteristics as related to hazards from lasers and other sources
,
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
66
,
15
20
.
15.
International Electrotechnical Commission
,
2001
,
Radiation Safety of Laser Products, Equipment Classification, Requirements and User’s Guide
,
IEC
,
Geneva, Switzerland
, IEC Publ. 60825-1.
16.
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)
,
Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents for 2004
,
Cincinnati
,
ACGIH
,
2004
.
17.
Henderson
,
R.
, and
Schulmeister
,
K.
,
2003
,
Laser Safety
,
Institute of Physics Publishing
,
Bristol
.
18.
Zuclich
J.A.
,
Lund
D. J.
,
Edsall
P. R.
,
Hollins
R. C.
,
Smith
P. A.
,
Stuck
B. E.
,
Till
S.
,
McLin
L. N.
,
Kennedy
P. K.
and
S.
Till
, “
Variation of laser induced retinal-damage threshold with retinal image size
”,
Journal of Laser Applications
,
12
(
2
),
74
80
,
2000
.
19.
Rockwell
,
B.A.
,
Hammer
,
D.X.
,
Hopkins
,
R.A.
,
Payne
,
D.J.
,
Toth
,
C.A.
,
Roach
,
W.P.
,
Druessel
,
J.J.
,
Kennedy
,
P.K.
,
Amnotte
,
R.E.
,
Eilert
,
B.
,
Phillips
,
S.
,
Noojin
,
G.D.
,
Stolarski
,
D.J.
&
Cain
,
C.
(
1999
)
Ultrashort laser pulse bioeffects and safety
,
J Laser Appl
11
,
42
44
.
20.
Ness
,
J.W.
,
Zwick
,
H.
,
Stuck
,
B.E.
,
Lund
,
D.J.
,
Lund
,
B.J.
,
Molchany
,
J.W.
&
Sliney
,
D.H.
(
2000
)
Retinal image motion during deliberate fixation: implications to laser safety for long duration viewing
,
Health Phys
78
,
131
142
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.