A version responses including the natural blink reflex were the main physiological protective measures in laser safety philosophy in the various standards, in which LEDs are included, since several years.

Therefore investigations have been performed in lab and field trials with high-brightness blue (468 nm), red (615 nm) and phosphor-converted (pc) white LEDs applied as single diodes or arranged as clusters (arrays with up to 80 single emitters) with output powers between 0.59 mW and 7.1 mW as extended sources with various virtual source sizes with an exposure duration of 125 ms or 250 ms.

A web cam with a frame rate of 25 Hz was used for the video documentation and subsequent evaluation of the obtained results.

Up to now a total of 2,250 volunteers have been irradiated with a laser beam (1,798) or an LED (452) in order to stimulate the blink reflex and 796 to register aversion responses.

A closer look on the various test procedures, beam geometries, i.e., collimated or divergent, type and location of stimulation (in the fovea centralis or parafoveolar/extramacular), point source or large extended source, shows that a central macular stimulation succeeds in a much higher rate of blink reflex reactions compared to the extramacular case. But compared with a stimulation performed with an LED the frequency obtained with laser irradiation is much lower.

In the case of a white light LED array the frequency of the blink reflex amounts to even more than 50 %, which is much closer to the one reported for a conventional camera flash. The results were surprising in the first moment since the applied LEDs belonged merely to the upper limit of the class 1 according to IEC 60825-1. The higher rate of stimulation might be explained by the much larger area which is irradiated and by the different spectra in the case of an LED application as well. Anyhow a clear psychophysical relationship according to the Stevens power law was obtained and it can be stated that the human eyes are much more protected against radiation from LEDs compared to those from lasers.

1.
IEC 60825-1: 1993 + A1:1997 + A2:2001,
Safety of laser products – Part 1: Equipment classification, requirements and user’s guide
.
2.
ICNIRP
(
1996
)
Guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 1,000 μm
,
Health Physics
71
,
804
819
.
3.
ICNIRP
(
2000
)
Revision of guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 400 nm and 1.4 μm
,
Health Physics
79
,
431
440
.
4.
ICNIRP
(
1997
)
Guidelines on limits of exposure to broad-band incoherent optical radiation (0.38 to 3 μm)
,
Health Physics
73
,
539
553
.
5.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
,
Amended proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (optical radiation)
, 13340/04,
Brussels
, 4 November
2004
, SOC 472 CODEC 1101
6.
ICNIRP statement
(
2000
)
ICNIRP statement on light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and laser diodes: implications for hazard assessment
,
Health physics
78
,
744
752
.
7.
Gerathewohl
,
S. J.
&
Strughold
,
H.
1953
)
Motoric response of the eyes when exposed to light flashes of high intensities and short durations
,
Journal of Aviation Medicine
24
,
200
207
.
8.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
&
Warmbold
,
H.
,
Hofmann
,
J.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
(
2001
)
First experimental results on eye protection by the blink reflex for laser class 2
,
Biomed. Tech.
46
, (
suppl.
),
428
429
.
9.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2002
)
First surveys regarding the blink reflex with low power lasers
,
Proc. Laser Bioeffects Meeting
,
Paris
11-1
11-16
.
10.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2003
)
Investigations concerning the blink reflex using laser class 2
,
ILSC Conf. Proc.
,
Jacksonville
, No. 103.
11.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
&
Hofmann
,
J.
(
2005
)
Results from two research projects concerning aversion responses including the blink reflex
, SPIE 5688B, accepted for publication
12.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2000
)
The eye blink reflex as a safety aspect working with incoherent light and LEDs
,
Proc. XII Polish-German Sem.
,
Development Trends in Design of Machines and Vehicles, Warsaw
, Oct.
2000
p.
100
108
.
13.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
,
Hofmann
,
J.
,
Olding
,
S.
,
Grave
,
R.
,
Schneider
,
G.P.
,
Voss
,
N.
&
Kirch
,
M.
(
2004
) Untersuchungen von Abwendungsreaktionen bei Stimulation durch LED-Strahlung, (in German; Investigations of aversion responses after stimulation by LED irradiation), In
H.-D.
Reidenbach
,
K.
Dollinger
,
J.
Hofmann
(Eds.)
Nichtionisierende Strahlung NIR 2004, Publ. Ser. Progress in Radiation Protection
,
Köln
, Bd. II,
849
864
.
14.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
&
Hofmann
,
J.
(
2005
)
Results of lab and field trials regarding the eye blink reflex as a safety means for LEDs
,
Proc. CIE expert symposium on LED light sources
,
Tokyo
2004
, accepted for publication.
15.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2004
)
The human aversion response and blink reflex behaviour is different for LEDs and low power laser
,
Proc. LEOS
2004
,
Puerto Rico
, ThAA3.
16.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2005
)
Investigations concerning aversion responses including the blink reflex using high brightness LEDs – Is there a difference compared with lasers?
,
Proc. XVIth Polish-German Sem., Development Trends in Design of Machines and Vehicles
,
Warsaw
,
June 2004
, accepted for publication.
17.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Hofmann
,
J.
&
Dollinger
,
K.
(
2004
)
Investigations concerning aversion responses including the blink reflex as a result of a stimulation with bright optical radiation from LEDs
,
Biomed. Techn. (Biomed. Eng.)
,
49
,
suppl. 2
,
672
673
.
18.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
&
Hofmann
,
J.
(
2003
)
Überprüfung der Laserklassifizierung unter Berücksichtigung des Lidschlussreflexes (in German), Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin
; Fb 985, Wirtschaftsverlag NW, Bremerhaven 2003 (
Abstract: Examination of laser classification with regard to the eye blink reflex
).
19.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
,
Hofmann
,
J.
,
Dollinger
,
K.
&
Seckler
,
M.
(
2004
)
A critical consideration of the blink reflex as a means for laser safety regulations, IRPA 11, Proc.
Madrid
,
23 – 28 May 2004
, paper 8c5.
20.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
(
2004
) Empfehlung zu aktiven Schutzreaktionen als neues Konzept der Unterweisung im Umgang mit Lasern der Klasse 2 (in German; Recommendations for active protection reactions as a new concept in the training using laser class 2), In
H.-D.
Reidenbach
,
K.
Dollinger
,
J.
Hofmann
(Eds.)
Nichtionisierende Strahlung
,
36
.
Jahrestagung NIR
2004,
Koeln
, p.
895
911
.
21.
Reidenbach
,
H.-D.
&
Wagner
,
A.
(
1999
)
Ein Beitrag zum Lidschlussreflex bei inkohärenter optischer Strahlung (Abstract in English)
, In:
31. Jahrestagung des Fachverbandes für Strahlenschutz
,
Köln
, 27.9.-1.10.1999, NIR 99, Bd. II,
935
938
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.