A measurement method has been devised to enable prediction of the propagation characteristics of a wide range of beams from both coherent lasers and incoherent broadband sources. Knowledge of the propagation behaviour of a beam allows measurements to be made of a range of its properties that are required for classification purposes by the laser safety standards. These measurements include estimates of the most hazardous spot size on the retina and therefore the angular subtense of the apparent source. They also enable unambiguous determination to be made of the nominal optical hazard distance.

The methods of measurement used in this work stem from the evolving ISO Standards for the measurement of beam diameter and divergence. The reproducibility and precision suggest that it is a measurement process that could be used by a number of test laboratories to assess a beam and obtain similar results. The apparent transportability of the procedure has yet to be proven but it has led to the suggestion that it be recommended in the Technical Report that is being drafted as an aid to performing the measurements required for the classification of beam according to IEC 60825-1:2001. The paper describes the measurement procedure using CCD array detectors to determine the truncated second moment width of the beam as it propagates through a waist. The methods are independent of subjective judgements and there is no ambiguity over the location of the waist.

1.
IEC 60825-1:1994,
Safety of Laser Products Part 1. Equipment classification, requirements and user’s guide
. Available from national standards organizations.
2.
ISO 11 146:1999. “
Test methods for laser beam parameters: beam widths, divergence angle and beam propagation factor
”. Available from national standards organizations.
3.
R. M.
Wood
, “
Laser induced damage thresholds and laser safety levels. Do the units of measurement matter?
”,
Opt. Laser Technol.
29
,
517
522
(
1997
).
4.
E.
Sutter
, “
Extended sources – concepts and potential hazards
”.
Opt. Laser Technol.
27
,
5
13
(
1995
).
5.
D.
Courant
,
L.
Court
, and
D.
Sliney
, “
Research relative to safety formulations for retinal damage from extended sources and large retinal images
”,
International Laser Safety Conference
,
Orlando
,
4
25
, (
1990
).
6.
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
, “
Guidelines on limits of exposure to laser radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 1,000 μm
”,
Health Phys.
71
,
804
819
(
1996
).
7.
J.
Angerstein
and
W.
Horak
, “
Significant features of semiconductor emitters related to optical radiation hazards
”,
International Laser Safety Conference
,
Orlando
,
211
220
, (
1999
).
8.
A. E.
Siegman
, “
New developments in laser resonators
”,
Proc. SPIE. Conf on Optical Resonators
, Vol.
1224
,
2
14
(
1990
).
9.
M. W.
Sasnett
and
T. F.
Johnston
,
Conference on Laser Beam Diagnostics
,
Proc. SPIE
1414
,
1
32
(
1991
).
10.
Stefan
Amarande
,
Adolf
Giesen
, and
Helmut
Hugel
, “
Propagation analysis of self-convergent beam widths and characterisation of hard-edge diffracted beams
”,
Appl. Opt.
39
,
3914
3924
(
2000
).
11.
Stefan
Amarande
and
Bernd
Eppich
,
6th International Workshop on Laser Beam and Optics Characterisation
,
Munich
, To be published., (
2001
).
12.
B A
Ward
, “In-process sampling and analysis of the far-field of a 21kW CO2 laser beam”,
Laser Beam Characterization
,
P M
Mejias
,
H
Weber
,
R
Martinez-Herrero
and
A
Gonzalez-Urena
, editors, (
SEDO
,
Madrid
1993
),
62
64
13.
B A
Ward
, “
The relationship between laser safety and beam characterisation standards
”,
International Laser Safety Conference
,
Copenhagen
, (
1995
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.